MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
I wish there was an easy way to grade out players based on defensive abilities but if some a measurement existed then I guess there would be no need for us all to argue who is the best.
As for McGwire and Thomas, I was surprised that they graded out this good. I do think McGwire should be considered (eventually) if Bonds is considered. But McGwire was a one trick pony. I don't remember his defense being anything special for even a 1st baseman (cannot remember if Thomas was ever above average there either) so I doubt he's really land in a Top 25 list, let alone Top 10.
because of defensive metrics there is also unfair qualifications that affect rankings as well...
for example, 1B almost never gets respect in all time great lists... because players generally have a bad DWAR, they are not fast...
sometimes players like Lou Gehrig and Ted Williams(who did not play first-but is seen similar to other 1Bman) make the lists, just because their offensive numbers are just that good... but others get these huge boosts for defense, or for baserunning, where those stats are much more difficult to measure...
I really think WAR gives way to big of a bonus for position....
i have said this before, but if i ever have the time that i am willing to give, i would love to make an all encompassing stat, that really measures things well... as i dont think WAR, or OPS+ do great jobs....