- Thread starter
- #41
calsnowskier
Sarcastic F-wad
I don’t really disagree, ftr.Brett I put above Boggs for sure. Have to check the others
I don’t really disagree, ftr.Brett I put above Boggs for sure. Have to check the others
I look at them@LHG
Please stop. I know you think you are helping. But you really are not.
Or at least just post your charts once.
But now it is just a weird voting mechanic excercize rather than productive baseball debate.
I look at them
Why? Your disdain for adjusted stats is well documented but not well defended.@LHG
Please stop. I know you think you are helping. But you really are not.
Or at least just post your charts once.
A record he's likely to keep. They call him Decision Jankins.....Cy Young has the best winning percentage of anyone with that many decisions…
The fuck? Block him if it bothers you, those charts are very useful.@LHG
Please stop. I know you think you are helping. But you really are not.
Or at least just post your charts once.
I agree with you on that. Griffey is too high. I think its a bigger stretch than Henderson's placement.Yea. Griffey getting voted in really tainted this for me. I always knew the poll was going to be more a popularity contest. But was always hoping logic would win at the end.
I have no problem with posting things once per thread.Why? Your disdain for adjusted stats is well documented but not well defended.
Funny to see who here thinks only their opinion counts LOL. This list is mostly dead on where it should be, with maybe 2-3 guys overslotted. So what?Yea. Griffey getting voted in really tainted this for me. I always knew the poll was going to be more a popularity contest. But was always hoping logic would win at the end.
Uh, this entire thread is us telling people what to think. That's the whole point of it, we argue about it. LHG makes his case, you make yours, and everyone thinks about how they want to vote.I have no problem with posting things once per thread.
But take out your formula you don’t want to tell people what to think. Just show them actual stats.
But you also need to show something more besides era+ or ops+.
Funny to see who here thinks only their opinion counts LOL. This list is mostly dead on where it should be, with maybe 2-3 guys overslotted. So what?
cal is giving a lot of the traditional stats and hardware information in his posts. Mine are supposed to show just one way to look at the pitchers. Everyone here is "trying to tell people what to think" in the sense that they are making their cases on who they think should be rated (except, of course, the silent voters).I have no problem with posting things once per thread.
But take out your formula you don’t want to tell people what to think. Just show them actual stats.
But you also need to show something more besides era+ or ops+.
If we're talking 3rd basemen we seem to have overlooked Eddie MathewsI don’t really disagree, ftr.
He is the next 3rd baseman on my list.If we're talking 3rd basemen we seem to have overlooked Eddie Mathews
Koufax is getting way more love than Kershaw which is crazy (according to logic), but you don't see me crying about itDidn’t say the list is tainted. Just said it got tainted for me.
I could go with wither really.Koufax is getting way more love than Kershaw which is crazy (according to logic), but you don't see me crying about it
Sure I get why Koufax is in the discussion I just think Kershaw had a far superior career.I could go with wither really.
Anything not provided by you is flawed and biased though. That is BSOnce a thread is fine. Any more and it sounds like he is a Jehovah’s Witness. Trying to convert people into thinking the flawed and biased things he does.