- Thread starter
- #5,081
WhiteMamba
John: 8:36
I didn't pay attention much during English lessons for grammar. I'm starting to now but im raw.
lol... My nephew uses that word... Raw.
I didn't pay attention much during English lessons for grammar. I'm starting to now but im raw.
I didn't pay attention much during English lessons for grammar. I'm starting to now but im raw.
Are you going to ASU bud?
Are you going to ASU bud?
Yea I want too but I did not try hard enough my first 2 years in highschool im going to have to go to SCC, but yes ASU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you are going to a Community College make sure you don't start meth man.
Is that bad that I am going to go to ASU just because they were my favorite team growing up and I couldn't imagine myself at any other school?
Not at all. Just make sure you get your degree from a University. For kids your age to be successful men you either need to do that or get a trade.
Electrician/Iron Worker/Contractor. Something like that.
And don't fuck up your credit.
That is great advice man. Take it from a 37 year old who has seen a lot in life.
Oh ok. So lets see the offensive numbers for those games compared to the patsies they've played so far.
Want to call me wrong once we see the dropoff in offensive stat output? Good luck.
You've won 64% of your games against teams with real Ds. Whats that qualify a team for, the holiday bowl?
No. I'm not wrong. When facing a real D your offense isn't beast mode. It's capable of winning 64% of the time.
Really?
2012
v Stanford 405 yards 14 points 20 first downs 207 passing 198 rushing.
v Fresno 532 yards 42 points 27 first downs 166 passing 366 rushing
vs patsies UW 497 yards 52 points 32 first downs 198 passing 299 rushing
vs Kansas State 385 yards 35 points 22 first downs 166 passing 219 rushing.
your argument has inconsistencies. Kansas State was not a top defense and year won, had less yarrds more points more first downs less passing and barely more rushing than that "real D" of stanford.
Oh ok. So lets see the offensive numbers for those games compared to the patsies they've played so far.
Want to call me wrong once we see the dropoff in offensive stat output? Good luck.
You've won 64% of your games against teams with real Ds. Whats that qualify a team for, the holiday bowl?
No. I'm not wrong. When facing a real D your offense isn't beast mode. It's capable of winning 64% of the time.
Oregon doesn't go beast mode because 1. thats a Cal running back thing. 2. beast mode is from a transformers comics and cartoons from the 90s where they transform into animals by saying beast mode. in other words taking things to a different level. Oregon doesnt change they play hard and fast all the time. therefore either no need for beast mode or always in it take your pick.
OK so you still win 64% of your games vs a real D. Congratulations?
Fresno state a real D? Really? What was their defense ranked at the end of that year? In fact what were all of those defenses ranked at the end of the season? UW's D as real???? Are you insane?
I notice you only listed 4 out of 14 here. Why?
Earlier you listed over 5 seasons.
Stanford has had a real D for 5 years and Oregon has OWNED us for 3 of 5. Stanford has to win more than lose to Oregon for the next 4 years for me to feel good about that game on the schedule every year. STFD Iron Breaker, even the PAC knows we have to beat the best to be the best each year.
OK always in it, and they only win 64% of the games vs the teams you listed earlier.
But they tried.
list the number of teams with a higher percentage against top 25 defenses in the same 5 years.
So the percentage keeps dropping. Now it's 60% vs teams that most of us would agree upon as having a real D.
STFD?
You first.