No Trade (who)

[bluepigpen]

Lets say that the Texans take or trade to the falcons the #1 pick and Clowney is the pick. It is now the Rams turn and no huge offer comes up to take you out of the pick, who do you pick, 1 name, we all know why each may be over the long term the best pick but for now, who is your pick in the 2014 NFL Draft? After the draft pick we will see where they went. Use any smile you want with the 1 name. Here are the possibles among many I guess that it could be but for what we hear they are the ones.

Mack
Manziel
Bortles
Matthews
Robinson
Watkins
Carr
Bridgewater

Other and Name

Have fun, we will for sure discuss all about the #2 pick later.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

I think they pick Robinson/Matthews.

I would take Mack.

 

[bluepigpen]

Robinson

 

[icefreeze57]

Watkins.

Mack is the next best choice, and might even be a better player then Watkins, but I think the Rams do want to focus on offense, but there's a lot of issues with Robinson and Jeff doesn't like taking OL in round 1.

I'm very against Robinson at #2 for the above and other issues, and not because I don't think he can be a good player in the league.v

 

[bluepigpen]

Angelakerams one name, pick one and a smile, just state Mack and a smile, who you think, who you think is best for the team.

 

[Clayton]

I would take Bortles. Just as raw as Robinson and Clowney except a QB

Mack is the safest bet of the elite guys. Id be fine with him, too, especially since the regime is fully behind Bradford

 

[icefreeze57]

I would take Bortles. Just as raw as Robinson and Clowney except a QB

I like Bridgewater the most, personally.

 

[Clayton]

I like Bridgewater the most, personally.

Bridgewater is too similar to Bradford to justify the pick, imo. I do think Bridgewater is a first rounder.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Mack

 

[icefreeze57]

Bridgewater is too similar to Bradford to justify the pick, imo. I do think Bridgewater is a first rounder.

I don't think I'm compare him to Bradford

 

[27mtrcougar]

#Mack. Won't be surprise if he goes #1 he is a perfect fit for Houston.

 

[icefreeze57]

Mack. Won't be surprise if he goes #1 he is a perfect fit for Houston.

Mack going #1 is ideal situation for the Rams, all of a sudden we get best offer for Clowney, and I really think we should NOT draft Clowney, especially if he can yield more picks. (For example with ATL a future 1st plus a 2nd, 4th or whatever the package would be. If we moved to ATL's spot we can still go DLine and take Donald, who I think is a top talent in the draft, and then still go safety at 13. Defense is much better, draft a starting OG in the 2nd as well as another player, or use that 2nd 2nd to move up or endless amount of possibilities.)

 

[Clayton]

I dont get why Atlanta wouldnt trade up for Mack at 2 but would trade up for Clowney at 1.

 

[BOSS429Mustang]

If the assumption is that Clowney is the #1 pick, I grudgingly take Wadkins. Him and Clowney are the two most dynamic players in the draft. We can still pick up the BPA at #13, whether it be OL or FS. Robinson and Matthews are good, but not worth the 2nd overall pick in the draft.

If Clowney is there, I don't think twice. If he's gone, I still try to get as much as I can for the 2nd pick WITHOUT moving out of the top 10.

 

[ozarkram]

Watkins

 

[27mtrcougar]

Mack going #1 is ideal situation for the Rams, all of a sudden we get best offer for Clowney, and I really think we should NOT draft Clowney, especially if he can yield more picks. (For example with ATL a future 1st plus a 2nd, 4th or whatever the package would be. If we moved to ATL's spot we can still go DLine and take Donald, who I think is a top talent in the draft, and then still go safety at 13. Defense is much better, draft a starting OG in the 2nd as well as another player, or use that 2nd 2nd to move up or endless amount of possibilities.)

You don't give up Clowney unless you're getting at least a first next year and their second this year. I'm fine with taking Clowney at 2

 

[27mtrcougar]

I dont get why Atlanta wouldnt trade up for Mack at 2 but would trade up for Clowney at 1.

I think it's a strong possiablity they will try. I think houston wants to trade back a couple spots and hope they can get Mack and pick up extra picks but I don't think they will get a trade partner the price is just to high. I think Fisher would love to trade with ATL and pick Matthews at six

 

[icefreeze57]

You don't give up Clowney unless you're getting at least a first next year and their second this year. I'm fine with taking Clowney at 2

Yeah, that would be required, I don't know what else we would get, isn't that what I said?


And I think they more egar to trade up for Clowney than Mack because I think he has more hype than Mack.

 

[zeke2829]

Robinson

Me too.....>>Greg Robinson<<
I believe he can help this team win quicker than any other guy in this draft!

6'5"-332lbs
4.92 in the 40 (hell.. we can play him at wr)
32 reps in the bench press (unreal for someone with 35" arms)
he has the strength to power wash half the d line
Excellent reach-blocking, chipping and releasing to the second level.
Very good balance in his set and is quick to cut off the rush
Can maneuver his hips, shuffle, slide and mirror.
Has a strong punch and replaces his hands.

 

[bluepigpen]

Angelakerams and Ozark got it right. Thanks. We can discuss all of them on another thread and have, just put down who you want and a smile. Even discuss how you think I am fun of shit on another thread, just want a name and smile on this one. Easier to count.