gkekoa
Well-Known Member
Citizenship is a 24/7 job, it comes with birth or the oath that one takes to become counted as one. What makes it hard work has little to do with the benefits that we are afforded, but, with the charge that despite our objections we stand in defense of even those who do objectionable things. Not illegal things we have laws against those things, but those things that shake us at a core level. Someone here wrote that 90% of fans attending Kaep's games found his stance objectionable, they have that right, but I, a citizen who has worn the uniform and took lives in defense of this nation stand against that 90%. I do so, not because they don't have a right to voice their objections, but when they do they fail citizenship 101 when their objections forces an action that punishes those who speak out against injustice and human rights violations no matter the venue.
What injustice is he standing against?
What human rights violation is he defending?
Why do those who find his stance objectionable fail citizenship 101?