Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
Yes I did delete it after I re-ran the PO machine.This is where you were incorrect. I'm guessing you deleted your response to mine already, asking where you were incorrect?
Yes I did delete it after I re-ran the PO machine.This is where you were incorrect. I'm guessing you deleted your response to mine already, asking where you were incorrect?
lol
He is doing some historic stuff on a bad team with a completely demolished offensive line. What he did yesterday in Arizona in only his 2nd start with a running game that wasn't giving him much was very impressive. Over 400 total yards and 4 total TDs with no turnovers. If he finishes the season out strong you would think he's gotta be ranked a top 15 QB heading into next season, right?
Who would be above him? No particular order:
Mahomes
Rodgers
Jackson
Allen
Watson
Dak
Herbert
Wilson
Stafford
Big Ben
Tannehill
Murray?
Cousins?
Goff?
Carr?
Mayfield?
Jones?
Ryan?
43 year old Brady?
42 year old Brees?
Yes I did delete it after I re-ran the PO machine.
I used it to see all four teams chances. Besides ut takes accounts for all tie breakers. It's not my fault Philly kissed their sister.You need a machine to figure out 6-9-1 is better than 6-10? Lmao.
against the bengals no less.I used it to see all four teams chances. Besides ut takes accounts for all tie breakers. It's not my fault Philly kissed their sister.
The Bengals OWN Pennsylvania.against the bengals no less.
He’s entertaining that’s for sure and I do think he’s good for the NFL, but yeah he’s a good example of someone that had reality hit pretty hard on.You're saying Minshew isn't top 5 of all time?
Yes and a couple of Wazzu homers were touting him as the second coming. Hurts is 1-1 and this stupid thread was posted, hopefully for Trolling purposes onlyHe’s entertaining that’s for sure and I do think he’s good for the NFL, but yeah he’s a good example of someone that had reality hit pretty hard on.
against the bengals no less.
Hate to tell you this, but the Eagles need the Giants to lose BOTH of their remaining games, not just one.
Um, they started 1-7......they have gone 4-2 since.
It's already been discussed and acknowledged. Try keeping up fucktard.Hate to tell you this, but you are 100% wrong.
Giants only need to lose one. Unless you can explain to me how explain to me how 6-10 has a higher win percentage than 6-9-1.
It's already been discussed and acknowledged. Try keeping up fucktard.
Didn't need it, just that I have used it ever since it came out, so I'm not trying to figure out 1,001 tie breakers.I'm responding to my notifications. You should have just taken the continued backlash for your dumbass post instead of telling me to go back and read the discussion on it. Now I've learned how you needed to use a playoff machine to figure out that 6-9-1 is a better record than 6-10.
Didn't need it, just that I have used it ever since it came out, so I'm not trying to figure out 1,001 tie breakers.
If you weren't such a fucking HOMER Clown, people might respect you. Unfortunately you are what you are.