Mayfield isn't worried about being unemployed. He's has 4 years in the league and what you see is what you'll get and that is how teams will evaluate Mayfield. A serious injury would really put a damper on his prospects, this is what players in the final year of contracts worry about,talk about and care about.
Yet he just played with a badly injured shoulder that needed surgery?
One of two things are going to happen.
You realize this is your opinion, right? I mean, they have the cap space (and then some) to carry his contract as opposed to move him in a bad deal or pay him to potentially beat us.
What? I never said that, never implied that, never even thought that.
That's not what I said. I said he be making a mistake if he came in claiming injury.
Cooper Rush is the BU, and no Jerry ain't trading to pay Mayfield 18+M
LOL at Cooer Rush, like he's some prize. Sorry, he may get you to 5-12 maybe.....if Dak got hurt. LOL.
What about if Carr goes down? Do they then trade for Mayfield?
Never said he's a prize, but it's obvious you don't know the Cowboys roster, nor the fact about Dallas not throwing money at outside talent.
If it were for 4-6 weeks I'd roll with Mullens. He's not a bad backup and a lot better than Rush.
because they don’t want him on the team and he has no trade value?
In fact, in post 878 when asked how I was a homer, this was your reply.....
If making it up as you go do better. Be more creative. Likely if Watson was not available Baker would still be the starter.
And? What does that have to do with anything? They now don't want him on the team. What is it exactly you are even arguing at this point? You don't make any sense
IF Watson is suspended he will not be starting. See if you can take it from there.
Again. What does that have to do with anything? I was the one who said Baker may be starting if Watson were suspended and would less likely to be cut if Watson were suspended to start the year in the first quote you copied and commented on. You seem so ready to argue that you don't even know what you are arguing
At this point that last comment is priceless as you are pretty much arguing with yourself. You say no one wants him and the Browns don't want him around (that was the comment to which I replied) yet you also say he may be starting if Watson is suspended.
Correct. No other team wants him. The Browns don't want him around and yet if Watson is suspended to start the year they may be forced to not only keep him but play him in spite of the fact that they are doing everything possible to unload him for literally anything. Yet somehow you don't understand and pretend it's others...
If they didn't want him around they could just not have him around. IF they might start him if watson is suspended you are a walking (well, typing) contradiction of yourself.
