jacobarch
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I'm OK Zeke. Some of these guys I'd like to get on the chessboard for some $$$. With their logic I could become rich quickly.
I'm actually pretty good at chess. Wanna play on yahoo?
Yeah, I'm OK Zeke. Some of these guys I'd like to get on the chessboard for some $$$. With their logic I could become rich quickly.
I'm actually pretty good at chess. Wanna play on yahoo?
......funny how you guys agree on everything
.....Jacob knows I'm just playin, we disagree often
and he knows I'm always right on every topic!
Prior to your insulting rant, it appeared to me that we were having a respectful conversation.If you want a respectful conversation Vita I suggest you demonstrate respect if you want to receive it back. Your condescending attitude is only going to be met with the same.
Archie's stats were not as good as they could have been because he was surrounded by a bad team. BUT, and it is a big but, he still proved that he was one of the better QBs by working with what he had. The if the Saints won any games, it was because of him. When did Bradford carry the team on his back? When did Bradford single handedly win any games just on his talent alone? When did he justify his ridiculous salary? The plain and simple answer is never.
And as far as comparisons of players of different eras, please, keep it in context OK. My point is Archie was better in his era than Bradford is in his. Forget the stats. Bradford fails the "eyeball" test. He also fails the "leader of the team" test. If Manning were playing today he would undoubtedly be better than Bradford, both statistically and leadership wise. End of story. End of argument. I'm not interested in what you have to say further, and I hope you're not interested in my opinion. I prefer it that way. As usual, you're not changing my mind and I'm not changing yours, so no further debate is necessary.
From your lips (Or keyboard in this instance ) to GOD's ears!Just as an aside I look for Bradford to have a Probowl season, fulfilling his early promise. And taking us a step closer too a ring. Just saying.
From your lips (Or keyboard in this instance ) to GOD's ears!
I think we can all hope for that Ozarkram!
Seems to me the Bradford issue is long settled. He is the starter end of story. :rollseyes:
Just as an aside I look for Bradford to have a Probowl season, fulfilling his early promise. And taking us a step closer too a ring. Just saying.
Man...I hope you are right. But it seems as though we were singing this tune this same time last year and the year before.
Man...I hope you are right. But it seems as though we were singing this tune this same time last year and the year before.
Hey, what other QB in the league can lock on to two receivers and look off two receivers all at the same time?if Sam is as much of a weenie as you say they should be better than Sam's too since in fact you were using Arch as the standard..
NO doubt about it... SamBradford is a complete weenie. Cross-eyed too. Can't read defenses fast enough, can't pull the trigger fast enough, can't run away from an old lady, can't make plays out of nothing (broken plays), likes to underthrow WRs, still not sure if he knows how to step up in the pocket, usually is not on the same page as WRs.
It will be comical this year if he continues not to communicate on the field with his WRs. Britt will flip on him. Sam's had young WRs for years and have you seen any direction from #8 when they are on the field?
These are the reasons why many people do not like Bradford. Sure the money hurts us, but he if he would sack up and be a man, we would all be ok with the money he's making. Clemens was awful, but he sacked up and stepped up in the pocket, could feel pressure and run when needed.
This is the NFC West people. Pressure is coming. Please tell that to our new rookie project OT Robinson as well.
#8 is a little beeyatch and now he's even slower.
See below. lol