- Thread starter
- #1
Jakology
I don't give a fuck
He was on fire tonight and called a fucking amazing game. Props.
Except on 3rd down. Fuck him right in his anal area on 3rd down.
He's a puppet and Saban is the puppet master.
If Saban hires average Joe off the streets they pretty much have the same success. It all goes through him. It's like Dick Cheney and George W.I don't think Saban would ever run a bubble screen of any kind. Half of the shit Alabama runs, I'm pretty sure Saban wouldn't run.
Hey! Saban ain't ever shot a guy....by accident.If Saban hires average Joe off the streets they pretty much have the same success. It all goes through him. It's like Dick Cheney and George W.
Wait til they lose their next title game.Hey! Saban ain't ever shot a guy....by accident.
He's a puppet and Saban is the puppet master.
I'm not sure that was all that great of a job by kiffin either. In that 2nd half, the run was either stuffed or coker was getting sacked. I'm not sure I really saw adjustments by kiffen that had any real effect. Those completions where the coverage was absolutely busted probably make kiffin look a lot better than he really was. But then again, maybe he was getting all that he could out of coker...?
I was thinking that. I am not sure what it was, but that was really bad defense from Clemson. I havent followed Clemson close enough, but I was wondering if they made a coverage scheme switch for the game (man to zone).
I may not be remembering this correctly, but I think their shut down corner had to leave the game leaving a not so great secondary short handed.
I know that, but these were pure assignment misses. It wasnt that someone getting beat on a route, they just lost WRs. That should not happen 15 games into a season, even with a back-up. I thought Clemson liked to press with Cbs, but they went zone vs Bama. Makes sense, because zone is better vs the run. I was wondering if they went more zone and less away from their normal schemes, which might explain the issues.