Dynasty

[Barilko]

this .....dynasty should have bigggggggggg rosters

YEPPER

 

[Barilko]

its Dynasty should be at least 20...

the fact we are 14 teams shrinks it down and we do not do IDP with that said those leagues usually have 30+

thus we should have at least 20

 

[TREFF]

this .....dynasty should have bigggggggggg rosters

I don't think I agree at all, what is the reasoning behind having such big rosters? Seems to me smaller would create more of a challenge in season. "Do I want to hang onto to this rookie who might be good on a couple years, or do I drop him so I can field a full, active team this week?" Having 30+ spots to choose from completely eliminates this.
Interested to hear the why for these big rosters

 

[TKOSpikes]

I don't think I agree at all, what is the reasoning behind having such big rosters? Seems to me smaller would create more of a challenge in season. "Do I want to hang onto to this rookie who might be good on a couple years, or do I drop him so I can field a full, active team this week?" Having 30+ spots to choose from completely eliminates this.
Interested to hear the why for these big rosters

I agree.

20 seems like a good number.

 

[The Foot]

I'd vote for 20 a nice round number. Next order of business would be to determine the draft date. Do we make itr a early draft along the lines of the suicide draft or do wait till the season is near.

 

[obxyankeefan]

I'd vote for 20 a nice round number. Next order of business would be to determine the draft date. Do we make itr a early draft along the lines of the suicide draft or do wait till the season is near.

I would say earlier than normal drafts, but not as early as the Suicide.

Another thing is which platform?
Yahoo
ESPN
Fantrax

 

[Microwahevo]

I'd vote for 20 a nice round number. Next order of business would be to determine the draft date. Do we make itr a early draft along the lines of the suicide draft or do wait till the season is near.

I was actually going to try and make it a slow draft on the site we use(if possible). Thinkig of using Fantrax as it offers nice options.

As for other topics to talk about, I will be making threads devoted to each topic. First one will be about roster size. Give me a few to get it started.

 

[TKOSpikes]

I guarantee Fantrax have the best flexibility.

Yahoo is not even an option, IMO.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Never used fantrax. Like the idea of going with what I'm use to, ESPN. Use Yahoo also, but find ESPN better. What does everyone else think?

 

[TKOSpikes]

I don't think we need a bunch of different threads. Seems easier to hash it out here.

14 team
20 man rosters
QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, FLEX, DST, K (Flex is RB/WR/TE)

Are we all agreed to this?

 

[Chef99]

I've gotta vote Fantrax. ESPN would be my second choice.

Harold, if you get a chance, take a look at Fantrax. It's a great site.

 

[TREFF]

I don't think we need a bunch of different threads. Seems easier to hash it out here.

14 team
20 man rosters
QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, FLEX, DST, K (Flex is RB/WR/TE)

Are we all agreed to this?

I dunno about agreed to, but I sure haven't heard much opposition..from those of us who are responding and inputting I'd say a majority have agreed, or given their indifference.

 

[TREFF]

As far the hosting site. .
fantrax would be my first choice as well...but ESPN would do just as nicely. Yahoo blows

 

[Microwahevo]

I don't think we need a bunch of different threads. Seems easier to hash it out here.

14 team
20 man rosters
QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, FLEX, DST, K (Flex is RB/WR/TE)

Are we all agreed to this?

I just think there's a lot going on in this thread. If I create separate threads, we can settle each topic there. We have plenty of time to get this hashed out.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I've gotta vote Fantrax. ESPN would be my second choice.

Harold, if you get a chance, take a look at Fantrax. It's a great site.

Might be time to broaden my horizons. I'd be willing to go Fantrax.

 

[Microwahevo]

Might be time to broaden my horizons. I'd be willing to go Fantrax.

I really liked ESPN too(still do), but Fantrax has been great for both football and baseball.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I really liked ESPN too(still do), but Fantrax has been great for both football and baseball.

Sounds good. Main reason for me is I know how ESPN works, never been on fantrax, but theirs a first time for everything.

 

[The Foot]

I say we do a slow draft as well. I know the fellows are getting ready to do the coma league slow draft why dont we set the draft tentatively for maybe a few days after the coma draft concludes. Just a thought.

 

[The Foot]

I have no major preference but I'd like espn to keep it the same.

 

[TREFF]

I honestly have no preference in a one day draft vs a slow draft here. .but I sure don't want it started before August