- Thread starter
- #21
averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
"It'll take a miracle."
"It'll take a miracle."
Week 5 the byes kick in, oh what fun that will be.4 weeks in - so many injuries it's pathetic. ..... ... I still go back to my lack of practice, conditioning and contact during the off-season as a prime reasoning for it. .... if nothing else it would weed out the weak and preserve the strong before the season.
Late to the party, but I wouldn't pull the plug this quickly unless I absolutely had to. I would bench the hell out of him, though, if I could, but not cut him.Thanks to everyone who contributed. You convinced me to not be so quick to dismiss Andrews.
So you don’t have to start a TE? In that case my advice wouldn’t apply.Well it's not that simple Milk. I have Kraft (GB) in reserve. But I also need the bench space to move up Shakir from the taxi squad in case Davante Adams cant go.
You have to understand that in my mind even a decent TE is only as good as a WR3 or WR4, so to me it makes no sense to hang on to a guy that is only going to get me a couple points a week and is trending down. Maybe for good, especially with Likely on the same team.
Right now the 12th-best TE is as good as a WR Tyler Johnson or a Darius Slayton or Tutu Atwell or Romeo Doubs. No one is gonna lose sleep over a TE13 or lower.
And i do like Kraft's upside particularly if Love returns.
No. I have to start a TE.So you don’t have to start a TE? In that case my advice wouldn’t apply.
My point is if everyone has to start one and they’re mostly getting 5 or 6 ff pts a game, and you get 10 or 12, that’s a big advantage. I’d hold out because I think that’s coming for Andrews.No. I have to start a TE.
My point was with as terrible as TE have been performing, its almost as meaningless as a WR3 or WR4 from a fantasy points perspective.