We most certainly can discuss things..but when given the answer to the question you asked about, accept the answer. You wanted to know the difference, both OBX and I gave you very obvious differences, which you dismissed. It gets old repeating yourself, especially on a topic which was deemed one way was acceptable and the other wasn't, years ago.wow pardon me, didnt know we couldnt discuss things......
wow pardon me, didnt know we couldnt discuss things......
again like i stated before it was a question....Fuckin' A, I've gotta agree with this. @TREFF , you're saying because Micro tanked and was a douchebag about it, he was less desirable than an "admirable" tanker? And that's also "end of story". Sorry, dude, I don't agree. Like I said, I grudgingly get the strategy, but that doesn't mean I like it. Tanking sucks, and it's a pussy way to play the game, no matter how you try to spin it.
And that's just one man's opinion.![]()
Its " end of story" because when this started it was deemed an acceptable strategy. There's no productive conversation to come of comparing the two, especially when its just in a circleFuckin' A, I've gotta agree with this. @TREFF , you're saying because Micro tanked and was a douchebag about it, he was less desirable than an "admirable" tanker? And that's also "end of story". Sorry, dude, I don't agree. Like I said, I grudgingly get the strategy, but that doesn't mean I like it. Tanking sucks, and it's a pussy way to play the game, no matter how you try to spin it.
And that's just one man's opinion.![]()
again, didnt know their couldnt be counterpoints, or different views on some other situation, like i said discussion but whateverWe most certainly can discuss things..but when given the answer to the question you asked about, accept the answer. You wanted to know the difference, both OBX and I gave you very obvious differences, which you dismissed. It gets old repeating yourself, especially on a topic which was deemed one way was acceptable and the other wasn't, years ago.
There can be, but at least acknowledge you were given the answer you were looking for, not just repeat the original question as if we'd just told you to look at the unicorn over there, and don't worry about the man behind the curtainagain, didnt know their couldnt be counterpoints, or different views on some other situation, like i said discussion but whatever
again, whats with shittyness? perhaps i didnt agree? not everyones words is gospelThere can be, but at least acknowledge you were given the answer you were looking for, not just repeat the original question as if we'd just told you to look at the unicorn over there, don't worry about the man behind the curtain
alright well sorry. Simply asking questions, the same ones @Chef99 said he was waiting to hear. Im gonna steer clear of this thread , again. People getting snippy.
Ugh..we don't have to agree. The "shittyness" was a reflex response to giving someone desired opinions/information and having it unacknowledged by simply repeating original statement, as if we'd said nothing at all. At least gimme a "I disagree" or something. We can disagree and get along on everything, but not if we can't at minimum acknowledge the others opinions.again, whats with shittyness? perhaps i didnt agree? not everyones words is gospel
No, one way your being a douche, using your crap players, the other is at least a respectable strategy, still using whatever possible optimum lineup you can. That is the difference. End of story
but whatever sorry i didnt acknowledge your reply.Ugh..we don't have to agree. The "shittyness" was a reflex response to giving someone desired opinions/information and having it unacknowledged by simply repeating original statement, as if we'd said nothing at all. At least gimme a "I disagree" or something. We can disagree and get along on everything, but not if we can't at minimum acknowledge the others opinions.
I get that they do yeild SIMILAR results, you're not wrong. however, there is a level of ethics in one method that doesn't exist in the other. Its perfectly fine if you don't see it that way, but that is the reasoning behind one being acceptable and one not. And that was something that was deeply discussed when setting this up. We can still discuss it, sure. But that basic principle is established and needs to be taken into account while discussing it.
Useful is valued more than even cake.I protest! "Shittiness" is not spelled with a 'Y'!![]()
Yes, you quoted the response after my initial one which wasn't shitty at all. Which you're right, neither response did acknowledge your opinion, as they were an answer to a question, not an argument against your opinion or its merits.This is not exactly acknowledging my point of view other, its more of again snippiness in response.
but whatever sorry i didnt acknowledge your reply.
Perhaps, but we know Chef loves cake..so he gets cake from meUseful is valued more than even cake.