tlance
Kyrie Hater
I'd pay the Brogdon deal at 20m per if that's what it needs to be. I wouldn't pay the 5 year 191m for Middleton...if somebody wants to pay that 4/150 for him...good for them...but I just don't see the value at $38m per year...that is just to much for the 2nd banana...
As stated above, I'd pay that happily vs Middleton's max...gleefully
Either way, neither of those deals seem all that "team friendly" to me...what about y'all?
Here is the problem though.
You develop a good young core, then you got to pay to keep them.
Middelton isn't necessarily worth 38 million a year, but unless the Bucks use that money to sign somebody better (unlikely) they are almost obligated to pay it.