Retroram52
Moderator
That's a different explanation altogether Boss!
Sam Bradford has been sacked 120 times in 49 career games and on 6.4% of his career drop backs.
Make excuses much?And if those numbers are correct, it makes me wonder if the guy can avoid a sack? I know many early were with a poor Oline, but is some of it that his decision making is slow and the game is too fast for him? Can he make split decisions? It's never good to develop happy feet, but does he have the quickness to avoid a sack? And from what I've seen, I would say no.
Lot of variables when you throw out stats.
Anyone else worried that Bradford will play well enough this season ( since he's playing for an extension ), gets that extension, and then reverts to injury prone/mediocre Bradford afterwards?
It's the Mark Sanchize syndrome. Play just well enough to provide the illusion you are on the doorstep to greatness, get the team to sign you to a contract extension, and then you show who you were all along while collecting ridiculous jack and leaving your team in a terrible position.
And if those numbers are correct, it
makes me wonder if the guy can avoid a
sack? I know many early
were with a poor Oline, but is some of it that his
decision making is slow
and the game is too fast for him? Can he make split
decisions? It's
never good to develop happy feet, but does he have the
quickness to avoid a
sack? And from what I've seen, I would say no.
Lot of
variables when you throw out stats.
Make excuses much?![]()
Just my opinion but I never had any confidence in Sam Bradford. To me he looked
like a deer in the headlights. Bobby Brady has to go, if the Rams get rid of him
they're making the right decision. Nothing against the guy personally, I just
haven't see him show me anything. He's got fear written all over him in pocket.
I suspect we'll be stuck with the Bradford experiment for one more year yet. Problem is what do we do next year when we definitively know that Bradford isn't the answer? We probably won't have a high draft pick to choose one of the QBs coming out then. If we can get Cousins for a 2nd rd. pick its a gamble. But we are gambling anyway going into the season with the likes of Clementine and also-rans at backup. If Bradford gets hurt again, which is always a distinct possibility with him, we go from the frying pan right to the fire. As QBs come off the board on draft day, Cousin's value is only going to go up. Maybe Washington would take a little less than a 2nd for him this early.
IDK Johnny football seems to be doing pretty darn well at the combine and he seems to have his tude in check.Yeah Bortles is the most gifted physically of all the QBs. I was originally high on Bridgewater, but I think I'd prefer Bortles now at this point. He's raw, but he definitely has the physical gifts.
I agree we have many options. This draft is very deep and we have some serious needs. A trade down or BPA is OK with me. But if Johnny is BPA I say take him. Clowney is fine seems to be a beast. Or a stud WR. No one seems to be on the OL bandwagon yet but there are some good ones out there. Gotta keep Sam upright.I really doubt the Rams draft a QB at this point. If they don't draft Clowney, I actually hope they trade out of the spot with maybe the Browns or Falcons. I think they can still get a great player at 4th or 6th and maybe get a substantial pick for the trade. Today more than ever before the way to build a team is through the draft, with the rookie pay scale in effect.