- Thread starter
- #361
BOTSLAYER
You can be anything
Uh, wrong.
Then Rings would mean nothing right? And you are talking about a 1 on 1 contest?
Because Wilt can be the better individual player with Russell still being better at basketball because basketball is a team sport. Their wins and losses show very acutely who was the better team player as well as the success of their teams.
So if all that matters is an individuals on court skill set disregarding the actual point to playing a game vs another team then I agree, Wilt would probably be higher than Russell on the GOAT list. But then again, it seems that the people who watched these 2 play gave Russell 5 MVPs to Wilt's 4 and Wilt did not get his 3 in a row until Russell was old while Russell earned his 4 in 5 years during Wilt's prime.
Also, despite what Russell says it seems that the MVP was voted on by the players until 1980, so Russell may have had a very high opinion of Wilt and his teammates, but it seems most of the players' opinion favored Russell during their primes.