MiamiVice
Well Liked Member
You don't get it you fucking idiot...It's hilarious to me that this needs to be explained to you.
You were saying that it makes no sense that when the Indians were winning, they drew huge crowds and how could it be so bad "only twenty years later." Bums referenced the fact that the exact same thing happened to the Tigers in an even shorter time period.
It's a perfectly good point, it made you look stupid with all your feigned business acumen, "oh, ballpark experience, blah, blah, blah," so you went straight to the personal insults.
You're a pathetic child.
The Tigers had poor seasons... and a fucking strike in that time. The Indians have continued to win a fair amount of games. His reference has nothing to do with the Indians. The Tigers from 84-96 situation is NOTHING like the Indians current version. When the Tigers win.. people went to games. Why do you think he didn't use 84-93... When the Indians win.. they still are getting nobody there.
The entire point of what I was saying is the Indians can field a winner and the fans don't come.. and attendance has declined even in a time when they were still fielding good teams... The Tigers had 3 straight years where they didn't win more than 60 games.. and a strike. So yeah.. that comparison is retarded.