Hambombs
Well-Known Member
Thought they were trying to stay away from large contracts
Nobody stays true to their word
Thought they were trying to stay away from large contracts
Kinda tough with all these names and teams are bandied about and not a mention of the Rangers, I must admit.I've been scouring as many sites today as I can, and I swear, the Rangers aren't mentioned - much less rumored - to be involved with anything.
Not necessarily a bad thing. Just a boring one.
I mean Kennedy would be ok. But I'm just concerned that he's a product of petco?
I mean Kennedy would be ok. But I'm just concerned that he's a product of petco?
Lets face it. Any GM worth his salt is not going to throw all his cards on the table for all to see. Just not a smart move leverage wise.
I've been scouring as many sites today as I can, and I swear, the Rangers aren't mentioned - much less rumored - to be involved with anything.
Not necessarily a bad thing. Just a boring one.
If both Kennedy and Colby pitch in the American League next year I think Colby would have the better season.
I agree and was going to respond to Wastin that Kennedy hasn't been that great in the NL. Wait until he doesn't get an auto out every time through the line-up. He will eat up innings though.
You surprised by the lack of respect your Bears are getting in the polls?
What on earth are the Marlins up too?
Miami Marlins offer two-year, $20 million contract to free agent 1B Adam LaRoche - MLB - SI.com
Loria is pretending to care so he won't get run out of the game. He will dump all the high priced contracts before too long. He's scum.
I'm not sure why you would say he hasn't been all that great in the NL. Over his 5 seasons in the NL, he averaged 13 Wins, a 3.81 ERA, and 185 K per season. Now while those aren't ace-type numbers, they are quite good for a #2-3 starter. He finished with a 3.63 ERA last season, ranking him 27th in the NL right next to Hudson, Leake, Lohse, and Santana. Those are all solid #3's. Furthermore, he finished with 21 Wins, a 2.88 ERA, and 198 K just 3 seasons ago.
Also, too much gets made out of AL vs. NL. The advantage that NL pitchers have basically boils down to 2 at-bats by the pitcher per game, as pinch hitters are used from the 6th or 7th inning on in most games. Plus, pitchers today are much better hitters than they were even as recently as 2000. There are a handful of them who are not automatic outs at all.
My point is that, while I don't think Kennedy would put up spectacular numbers for the Rangers, he could easily post a 4.00 ERA and 175 K while rarely (if ever) missing his turn in the rotation. You can't say the same about Colby or Tepesch.
I think it goes beyond the pitchers batting. Often there will be a half of a run difference in ERA when pitchers switch leagues. The AL hitters are probably better.
It's not just that the pitcher doesn't hit in the AL. It's that he's usually replaced with a MOTB DH, thus everyone below him moves down a spot in the order.
NL parks tend to be more pitcher friendly as well. Cincy and Philly are the only ones I can think of that's really hitter friendly.