flyerhawk
Well-Known Member
here is a list of coaches, none of them feel inspiring
harbaugh is the only proven name on that list
IMO, I would prefer someone who is not proven. More risk but a much better chance of big success.
here is a list of coaches, none of them feel inspiring
harbaugh is the only proven name on that list
I think we need an offensive HC and a DC like dan quinn. Harbaugh while personally hard to like, can get the most out of low quality Qbs and can build a running game.
I thin Bienemy is a name to consider.Going with an offensive-minded HC makes a lot of sense in today's NFL because if you do it the other way and then hire a bright OC, they often get snapped up after a couple years to be HCs.
thats possible, could be shanahan or could be brandon staley. but harbaugh has been to a superbowl and three NFC championships in a row? and he did it with colin freaking kaepernick and alex smith.IMO, I would prefer someone who is not proven. More risk but a much better chance of big success.
Yeah, Pete has been amazing for Seattle, but it’s getting to be time, all good things come to an end and I think his run in Seattle is coming to its conclusion.. I was never happy with Pete expecting Geno to suddenly be that guy, he’s done better than we all expected, but you can see his mental inconsistency all the time…
I thin Bienemy is a name to consider.
Washington is averaging fewer points per game than the Seahawks this season. no to Harbaugh. Need a fresh upcoming offensive mind hopefully not old.He made Sam Howell a starting caliber QB.
He made Sam Howell a starting caliber QB.
We were mostly a 4-3 with bigger guys on the line with KJ, Wags and whoever else at LB. They were always strong against the run throughout those years. 3-4 now does not work as opposing teams o-line is much bigger against our guys opening gaping holes for their RBs to gash us.In defense of Pete, I think this is largely not a thing. His defense has ALWAYS been a quasi 3-4 defense. Even in our great years.
Bradley, the 4-3, and the LEO
Jacksonville Jaguars head coach Gus Bradley runs a unique variation of the 4-3 that pulls from multiple defensive philosophies, utilizing something called a LEO. We explain what this all means.www.bigcatcountry.com
If we call Nwosu or Mafe or Taylor a DE does that somehow make us a 4-3?
I'm not smart enough to know what this defense really needs to do to get good. I feel like we have too many good pieces for it to be this bad. Not that I think it is terrible but it should be better.
Our offense, OTOH, makes no sense to me. There are teams with weaker lines and weaker QBs that perform better than our offense does.
We were mostly a 4-3 with bigger guys on the line with KJ, Wags and whoever else at LB. They were always strong against the run throughout those years. 3-4 now does not work as opposing teams o-line is much bigger against our guys opening gaping holes for their RBs to gash us.
It's not hindsight when I was banging the gavel wanting to trade up for CJ. I never like giving up draft assets but in this case I would have sold the farm for him. Mid way his junior year I thought this kid had all the tools and a better prospect than Bryce Young. Time will tell but on the short term what he's done in Houston is remarkable considering he's throwing to no name WRs and the team was projected to finish last in the league.Every single head coach wants to win now. Even moreso when they are 70+ years old. I guess I don't understand what people thought they were going to get with Pete after we traded Russ.
You and I have gone back and forth on this but I still think you are too myopic about it. I know a lot of fans are pointing to CJ Stroud and saying that we should have gone after him. Hindsight is a helluva drug. First off, he was already gone when we drafted. Secondly, it's unlikely that we could have traded for him. Lastly, we don't know whether he will be a good QB or no.
FTR, I think the Williams trade was a good trade and we will resign him. But if we don't he will likely go somewhere else and help us nab a 3rd round pick anyway.
It's both. You can have the personnel that doesn't succeed cause of the scheme.But that is an issue of personnel, not scheme.
It's not hindsight when I was banging the gavel wanting to trade up for CJ. I never like giving up draft assets but in this case I would have sold the farm for him. Mid way his junior year I thought this kid had all the tools and a better prospect than Bryce Young. Time will tell but on the short term what he's done in Houston is remarkable considering he's throwing to no name WRs and the team was projected to finish last in the league.
It's both. You can have the personnel that doesn't succeed cause of the scheme.
Gotta keep adding to the defense which played well for being backed up at times and yes Geno shit the bed again. 2nd half of last years playoff game was worse. That ended the season.Thought you guys were at least decent on defense despite the score. Defense got 0 help from the offense and you're not going to beat the 9ers offense if you don't pressure them out of the run game.
Geno always looks lost against the 9ers D. Feels like if he's getting pressure he gives up and just waits to be sacked. He can sprinkle a string of nice plays but seems like a matter of time before the wheels fall off.
Still between the 4 games out the Geno era Hawks this might have been the worst I've seen them play.
If Richardson was their 2nd choice they might have moved for the farm. Trading with Chicago would have been more ideal.I doubt there was any way we could have convinced Houston to trade down to us.
Sure it does. This current scheme they're in their designated position but change it to a 4-3 scheme they're not and possibly drafting for the 4-3 scheme means drafting different personnel.The point is whether you call someone like Darrell Taylor or Nwosu a linebacker or a de doesn't really change anything.