theboardref
thewhite_00 ESPN board
Honestly thought Penn State had a loss how little I’ve been hearing about them. Just goes to show, what you have done lately sometimes matters more who your are this year.
This is of course assuming Minnesota and Ohio State aren't undefeated in the B1G CG. Then an OSU loss there you'd have 13-0 and 12-1 OSU who I would think both get in.
Lsu is number 1 in tbe Vegas top 25 meaming vegas would have them as a favorite vs everyone on a neutral field
To be honest there’s quite a few teams that would run the table playing Clemson’s schedule. I could see a very legitimate debate for a few 1 loss teams. Getting in over an undefeated Clemson who’s playing a UCF level schedule.So if Alabama played Penn States schedule what’s Alabama’s record right now? What about Ohio States schedule? Who has Ohio State played before yesterday?
Bama is favored in early lines by 6. Part of thats due to homefield for sure . Bama is number 2 in the Vegas top 25 btw. Psu is 7th. The spread on neutrsl fiejd wiyld pribanly be 7-8 for both over penn stateSo, diff topic, if Alabama is favored against LSU do you think it's due to home field advantage?
Ok..30 May be an exaggeration but Alabam would win comfortably by at least 2TDs and the game would never be in Doubt.
Ohio State is very legit though. They should make it at 11-1 even if they don’t win B1G
This is the reason I hate college football.,
I think everyone is underestimating Penn St. I think it would be a much closer game than that.
Only possible if PSU beats Ohio State. Alabama and LSU would beat PSU by 30
Back to the original question, it probably has something to do with the fact that the last time they put two SEC teams in the playoff they both won their semi-final. The last two times they put 1 B1G team in the playoffs they lost 31-0 and 38-0. If they put two B1G teams in and they both shit the bed, no 1-loss B1G team will get in for a decade.
You got left out of the last two for a reason, your champion last year barely got by a 4-loss team in the Rose Bowl that lost to a 4-loss SEC team. Your 2017 Champion lost by two touchdowns to a semi-final loser.
You'll have to excuse some of us if we are not sold on the dominance of the B1G.
Y'all are starting to sound like UCF, remember that one time...five years ago...
That's quite the hyperbole there.
Did you miss the qualifier....or do I need to explain it to you again. If they put two B1G teams in and they both get beat 30 something to nothing, it will take a good while to convince someone to put a 1-loss B1G champion in the playoffs. Shit, the Pac only lost 24-7 the last time they got in and nobody is giving them a 25% chance to get one in, and they have two 1-loss teams.
Did you miss the qualifier....or do I need to explain it to you again. If they put two B1G teams in and they both get beat 30 something to nothing, it will take a good while to convince someone to put a 1-loss B1G champion in the playoffs. Shit, the Pac only lost 24-7 the last time they got in and nobody is giving them a 25% chance to get one in, and they have two 1-loss teams.
Back to the original question, it probably has something to do with the fact that the last time they put two SEC teams in the playoff they both won their semi-final. The last two times they put 1 B1G team in the playoffs they lost 31-0 and 38-0. If they put two B1G teams in and they both shit the bed, no 1-loss B1G team will get in for a decade.
You got left out of the last two for a reason, your champion last year barely got by a 4-loss team in the Rose Bowl that lost to a 4-loss SEC team. Your 2017 Champion lost by two touchdowns to a semi-final loser.
You'll have to excuse some of us if we are not sold on the dominance of the B1G.
Y'all are starting to sound like UCF, remember that one time...five years ago...
Was it their OT win over Northern Iowa or their boat race of WVU that convinced you Iowa State was all-world. Cause all that did was convince me that they and Iowa were overrated...and WVU sucked ass.
Are you under some assumption A&M is worth a crapload of shit because all their wins came against teams that have a combined record of 14-25? Or is it just the bias that comes with being a bama fan to pump up your opponents when you haven’t played shit?
Also, people are projecting an additional loss for Oregon and Utah. If Oregon runs the table, either they or OU will be in over a 2nd SEC team.