Huh? Bell was far from the problem against Jacksonville last year.Really????
Playoffs, last year, Jacksonville.
He's a malignant ignorant douche!!!!
Huh? Bell was far from the problem against Jacksonville last year.
Sure, it was dumb and he shouldn't have done it.Yea, he didn't give Jacksonville the ammunition to destroy us with his social media bullshit games.
I see how intuitive you are to things.
Sure, it was dumb and he shouldn't have done it.
But take Bell away and that game isn't even close. I still stand by that, Bell was not the issue. At least not the biggest one.
You think Stevan Ridley/Fitzgerald Touissant puts up 155 yards and two scores on a defense that already once buried them that year without that needed fire? Really?Can you say that for certain????
No.
The outcome may have been very different had her not pissed them off and lit a fire under their asses.
You think Stevan Ridley puts up 155 yards and two scores on a defense that already once buried them that year without that needed fire? Really?
You think Stevan Ridley puts up 155 yards and two scores on a defense that already once buried them that year without that needed fire? Really?
did u think conner would do what hes doing
did u think conner would do what hes doing
I tend to agree he wouldn't but I'd hardly call Conner or DeAngelo Williams no name, eitherIt has been proven many many times on this team, no name running backs do well.....
Bell is finding that out first hand.
Cause it's a safe bet he doesn't put up big numbers like he has someplace else.
so is ur argument on ridley, every argument you have made is "what if" or "it could happen" theres zero basis behind any of it
That's a strawman and you know it
He's 29 years old and had 7 years and 8 teams in the NFL to show he could even come close to that. How is it the strawman? Is he not the backup? Has he not had plenty of shots in the NFL and is old by running back standards and hasn't shown to be any more than a journeyman?so is ur argument on ridley, every argument you have made is "what if" or "it could happen" theres zero basis behind any of it
He's 29 years old and had 7 years and 8 teams in the NFL to show he could even come close to that. How is it the strawman? Is he not the backup? Has he not had plenty of shots in the NFL and is old by running back standards and hasn't shown to be any more than a journeyman?
Also "zero basis behind any of it." Are we forgetting Conner ended 2017 on IR?
Also also, it's no more "what if" than saying what if Bell comes in and ruins the locker room.
I tend to agree he wouldn't but I'd hardly call Conner or DeAngelo Williams no name, either
Wow, are we really going back to the 90s for this? 2012 with Dwyer and Redman? 2014 with Ben Tate and Josh Harris?No......
Walter Abercrombie
Bam Morris
Barry Foster
This team has done it forever
Wow, are we really going back to the 90s for this? 2012 with Dwyer and Redman? 2014 with Ben Tate and Josh Harris?
so ridley was a back up? ..........conner was a back up? got it
i give up. you win, we need bell , hes awesome, hes a swell guy, everyone will like him, all things will go well, there is no potential for problems.
That's literally where the similarities end. Refusing to look closer at it is dishonest.so ridley was a back up? ..........conner was a back up? got it
You're better than throwing fits. No one is saying it's fool-proof or that there are possible problems. But I'd rather roll those dice on a team with a strong leadership group to keep him in line than risk having a guy who is has been a career backup for 8 seasons be the guy.i give up. you win, we need bell , hes awesome, hes a swell guy, everyone will like him, all things will go well, there is no potential for problems.