Gman
Well-Known Member
My main point here is that 8 years from now is not a good thing to fret about... because 8 years from now is almost totally beyond your control right now. Getting Barrett now not only doesn't guarantee anything... it doesn't even qualify as a solid nudge in the direction you hope to dictate.8 years seems like a long time.
It really isn't.
Because it takes most future stars a couple years to come into their own at the NBA level, a couple more to gel with the prices around them, then usually a couple more after that to learn to win in the playoffs.
That is a 5-6 year learning curve before most "superstars" are ready and in position to lead a contender.
This is year 6 for Giannis. The Warriors didn't contend until year 6 for Curry. I could go on here.
There are exceptions when you pair the young star with a star veteran, but that is unlikely to happen in NOLA unless AD has a change of heart.
Playing the "8 years is a long time" game and not investing in that relationship with your guy who could be a transcendent player is a dangerous game.
Like waving your arms in your backyard to try to start a hurricane a few weeks later and a thousand miles away.
A billion different things are gonna happen between now and then.
By far, the more important part of the equation is whether the guys in question are players or not.tlance said:Not to mention, there are obvious perks that come with pairing together 2 dynamic rookies like Zion and Barrett. They both hit RFA and UFA at the same time. Giving the Bucks a full 4 years with their 2 best players on rookie deals to allow them to gel and add pieces around them. Tatum would speed that clock up by 2 years.
By far.
That is what should dictate any decision on the Pel's part... this "won't somebody think of Zion's feelings?!" stuff is nutz.