Rockinkuwait
Well-Known Member
I don't know what 506 passes to 460 rushing attempts says to you but it's balanced to me. Somebody has to have the highest pass/run ratio. But 506 to 460 is balanced and that's what you seem to have a problem with, and frankly you can type 10 paragraphs and it's still balanced.
Point remains....Dallas lost not because teams choose to play the game close. They lost for exactly what I said.
Again, quit the "Dallas lost because" bit... I am not saying Dallas lost because opponents called conservative playcalling. This is the 3rd time you've tried now to make it about that, the third time I've said that isn't my point, and not saying that in any way shape or form.
Balanced is a 50% completion rate? Tim Tebow is the Balance of what you'd have for a QB's completion percentage? 506-460 says 2nd fewest pass attempts against and 26th fewest rush attempts against, and that goes even well beyond that when you take Romo's games out of the equation.
A "balanced diet" isn't 1/3 fruit/veg, 1/3 meat and 1/3 dessert even if those ratios are the same. If you need "balanced" to always be "closest to 50/50" then fine, use whatever term you want for being the outlier, because that's where Dallas' opponents were with their run to pass rate.
To me balanced is average, in the middle of what people choose to do. If there's 31 people on one side of a teeter totter, and 1 on the other, that isn't balanced. Without Romo, Dallas is that one person on that side of the teeter totter in terms of run:pass ratio last year is all I am saying. Put whatever word to describe that you want, don't get yourself stuck in the weeds over the term here...
2 questions...
1. Do you consider a balanced QB (not a pocket guy, not a scrambler but in-between) a guy who in 600 drop backs scrambles an NFL record 300 times for that .500 split? Or would it be a guy who scrambles more than Brady but less than Cam, somewhere in the middle?
2. Why else did teams choose to have the highest run to pass rate vs. Dallas without Romo?