• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Who has the best offensive unit in the NFC?

Who has the best offensive unit in the NFC?


  • Total voters
    61

Battlelyon

Super Bowl Champions Rams
23,533
10,430
1,033
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Location
Uniontown, Ohio
Hoopla Cash
$ 118.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not the same team. They weren't even that good last year.
They weren't goid, they were great. Great teams shutout opponents in the 4th quarters of Conference title games and Super Bowls. You turn it on when you need too. But you wouldn't know anything about that being a one hit wonder. Rams don't care about doubters like you or clowns in the media. Every year we can contend with McVay, Stafford and Donald.
 

returnofjakedog

Well-Known Member
2,092
1,543
173
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Location
Port Townsend
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

RememberTheKoy

Well-Known Member
10,450
6,000
533
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
lo69q6jde1991.jpg
 

molsaniceman

I aint drunk Im just drinking
17,617
4,219
293
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 34,570.83
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
they are both in same article so which do u believe


 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
29,664
7,833
533
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

The next superstar Eagles WR
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
29,664
7,833
533
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Cheater...

 

cdumler7

Well-Known Member
25,877
3,965
293
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Just catching up on this thread but the problem with the OP's original thoughts is he has put no weight into actual positional value. He throws in that Hurts is maybe middle of the pack QB like that is nothing because the other units are so good, but the reality is QB is what makes those other units work. Believe me being a Bronco fan I have heard for years since Manning retired that the Broncos have a great roster other than QB. IF they could just get a top-10 QB they would go crazy on the league. Well what ended up happening was watching an offense stall out even though the WR's were getting separation at the 3rd best rate of any team in the NFL last year. I watched 2 RB's that could be dominant if they could go against lighter boxes, but watched teams dare the Broncos to have to throw knowing it wouldn't work. Eagles are obviously in a better spot with Hurts but the offense will go as Hurts goes. And I don't see him climbing into that top-10 discussion any time soon.
 

returnofjakedog

Well-Known Member
2,092
1,543
173
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Location
Port Townsend
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Just catching up on this thread but the problem with the OP's original thoughts is he has put no weight into actual positional value. He throws in that Hurts is maybe middle of the pack QB like that is nothing because the other units are so good, but the reality is QB is what makes those other units work. Believe me being a Bronco fan I have heard for years since Manning retired that the Broncos have a great roster other than QB. IF they could just get a top-10 QB they would go crazy on the league. Well what ended up happening was watching an offense stall out even though the WR's were getting separation at the 3rd best rate of any team in the NFL last year. I watched 2 RB's that could be dominant if they could go against lighter boxes, but watched teams dare the Broncos to have to throw knowing it wouldn't work. Eagles are obviously in a better spot with Hurts but the offense will go as Hurts goes. And I don't see him climbing into that top-10 discussion any time soon.
Good points regarding the QB performance, and over-rating specific qualities based on homerism.

The OP's initial statement was just more the laughably stupid bullshit that he constantly spews:

"I'm not talking about who has the best offense. Who is going to score the most points or anything boring like that. I'm talking about who has the best unit. Who has the whole package. Who has the frank and the beans. When you take all of the components of the offense: the OL, the WRs, the TEs, the RBs & the QB. Who has the best collection of those items in the NFC?"

.......so apparently the "best offense package" aren't the ones that score the most points, or get the most yards, or are the most efficient, or performs the best to help their team win?? Instead it is about individuals, and their possible potential on paper during the offseason.

The entire premise is utterly retarded. The best offense is the offense that performs the best, not looks the best on paper according to some arbitrary and biased opinions. But this is typical bs from RtK who constantly hand jobs his hometeam to the point of ridiculousness.

Here is a better offensive unit for ya!
Screenshot_20220718-120100_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:

cdumler7

Well-Known Member
25,877
3,965
293
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Good points regarding the QB performance, and over-rating specific qualities based on homerism.

The OP's initial statement was just more the laughably stupid bullshit that he constantly spews:

"I'm not talking about who has the best offense. Who is going to score the most points or anything boring like that. I'm talking about who has the best unit. Who has the whole package. Who has the frank and the beans. When you take all of the components of the offense: the OL, the WRs, the TEs, the RBs & the QB. Who has the best collection of those items in the NFC?"

.......so apparently the "best offense package" aren't the ones that score the most points, or get the most yards, or are the most efficient, or performs the best to help their team win?? Instead it is about individuals, and their possible potential on paper during the offseason.

The entire premise is utterly retarded. The best offense is the offense that performs the best, not looks the best on paper according to some arbitrary and biased opinions. But this is typical bs from RtK who constantly hand jobs his hometeam to the point of ridiculousness.

Here is a better offensive unit for ya!
View attachment 302420

Oh definitely could see he wanted the opportunity to try and hype up his own guys rather than have a real conversation. Any time you have to include a lot of "If's" into the conversation you've already lost. I wish we could live in the world where "If's" always worked out to their full potential, but then we wouldn't have a real world. Eagles look like they have some decent potential and in the NFC that could be enough to get them a playoff spot. They also look like a team that could finish dead last in their own division. So to put them up near the top talk of the NFC is just ridiculous at this point.
 
Top