Vikings post game

[skinsdad62]

lol. You make excuses for TH. You are trying to say you are not bias against Wentz? lol

what excuses did i make dean ? enlighten me .

 

[duke1861]

Colts had a different QB when They beat the Chiefs. I would say both but it just obvious that TH is not a good starting NFL QB. Not saying Wentz is elite but he is not as bad as TH

The QB was Matt Ryan..the same QB you badmouth.

I think everyone agrees with you that Falco is not a good starting NFL QB. Has anyone here said that? Everyone here has pretty much said he is a backup right?

The difference is with Wentz. The team responds better to Falco and the offense is more tailored to falco. That doesn't mean Falco is better, it just means the team players better with him in the game. The weaker OLine is better for Falco as he is more mobile. Wentz doesn't perform well behind this line.

 

[duke1861]

Wentz is not a bad qb. Of course, KC is playing well. TH doesn't belong in the conversation. He is only being played b/c of injury and has shown nothing that he can be a starting qb in the NFL. If you guys think he is a good qb teams will be after TH in FA.

The team is not bad like you say it is. Wentz is not a bad NFL QB.

Yes, Wentz is a bottom tier QB in the NFL. If he wasn't, he would not be on his 3rd team in 3 years and the colts would have had numerous trade offers.
So you admit cousins is better and has had the better career?

We have the #26 offense and around the number 20 defense. We are about to go through a tough stretch of games here. We are currently below .500 and have played several crappy teams.

 

[deanpet21]

The QB was Matt Ryan..the same QB you badmouth.

I think everyone agrees with you that Falco is not a good starting NFL QB. Has anyone here said that? Everyone here has pretty much said he is a backup right?

The difference is with Wentz. The team responds better to Falco and the offense is more tailored to falco. That doesn't mean Falco is better, it just means the team players better with him in the game. The weaker OLine is better for Falco as he is more mobile. Wentz doesn't perform well behind this line.

yes people think we should still play TH when Wentz is healthy. Thats not admitting he is a backup QB. Most of this board want him to still play. Wentz is the better QB period.

 

[deanpet21]

what excuses did i make dean ? enlighten me .

you are saying we should of rolled with TH from the get-go. I disagreed.

 

[kbso83432]

Not gonna lie, kinda ready to see Wentz again. Unless TH balls out Monday.

 

[duke1861]

Not gonna lie, kinda ready to see Wentz again. Unless TH balls out Monday.

I am ready to see an actual starting QB on the team. Neither Falco or Wentz fit that discription.

 

[skinsdad62]

you are saying we should of rolled with TH from the get-go. I disagreed.

how is that an " excuse " dean ? what i said is we would have been 2-4 with falco . that is ALL i said . now what excuse did i make for falco's play ? you said EXCUSE not me but YOU

now if you are saying that i am saying or implying at any time we should have gone with falco then you have a very poor grasp of the kings english because nowhere did i say or imply that .

most people who understand the kings english know the difference between saying "we would have been 2-4 with falco" is not the same as " we should have rolled with falco " so stop with the BS dean

 

[deanpet21]

how is that an " excuse " dean ? what i said is we would have been 2-4 with falco . that is ALL i said . now what excuse did i make for falco's play ? you said EXCUSE not me but YOU

now if you are saying that i am saying or implying at any time we should have gone with falco then you have a very poor grasp of the kings english because nowhere did i say or imply that .

most people who understand the kings english know the difference between saying "we would have been 2-4 with falco" is not the same as " we should have rolled with falco " so stop with the BS dean

no bs, plus you cant say we would be 2-4 with TH. You have no pay of proving that.

 

[duke1861]

no bs, plus you cant say we would be 2-4 with TH. You have no pay of proving that.

But you do the same thing week in and week out.
You said this off-season that if we had Wentz in 2021, we would have swept the eagles and made the playoffs.
You literally have no way of proving that and you have no idea how Wentz would have played in those games. You made a assumption that you could not prove. Wentz has not played well against good teams, as such, how can you know that he would not have had a melt down against the eagles? You don't.
You have repeatedly said that if Wentz had the "new" defense, that he would have won additional games. You have no way to prove that. You are assuming again. Most of your assumptions have never come to fruition as you know.
If you are going to accuse skinsdad of making assumptions with no proof, I suggest you stop doing it yourself. You have done this more than any poster here.

 

[gkekoa]

I refuse to believe TH is a better QB than Wentz. That is just nuts to me.

Define a better QB. We have been a far better team with TH than Carson Wentz. It is indisputable.

 

[gkekoa]

yes people think we should still play TH when Wentz is healthy. Thats not admitting he is a backup QB. Most of this board want him to still play. Wentz is the better QB period.

I say play TH over Wentz. That is not stating anything other than play TH over Wentz.

TH is a poor man’s backup QB. Wentz is not even that. Both suck.

You play TH because you want to keep your second round pick and Wentz provides nothing more than TH, except in your wet dreams.

 

[deanpet21]

But you do the same thing week in and week out.
You said this off-season that if we had Wentz in 2021, we would have swept the eagles and made the playoffs.
You literally have no way of proving that and you have no idea how Wentz would have played in those games. You made a assumption that you could not prove. Wentz has not played well against good teams, as such, how can you know that he would not have had a melt down against the eagles? You don't.
You have repeatedly said that if Wentz had the "new" defense, that he would have won additional games. You have no way to prove that. You are assuming again. Most of your assumptions have never come to fruition as you know.
If you are going to accuse skinsdad of making assumptions with no proof, I suggest you stop doing it yourself. You have done this more than any poster here.

of course, b/c its obvious that Wentz is the better QB. lol

 

[deanpet21]

Define a better QB. We have been a far better team with TH than Carson Wentz. It is indisputable.

the team is better b/c the defense is playing better, and we are playing below avg teams like Indy and GB. Last week the defense kept us in the game not TH. Are you saying TH is responsible for the 3-game winning streak? lol

 

[deanpet21]

I say play TH over Wentz. That is not stating anything other than play TH over Wentz.

TH is a poor man’s backup QB. Wentz is not even that. Both suck.

You play TH because you want to keep your second round pick and Wentz provides nothing more than TH, except in your wet dreams.

you can still play Wentz to see if we get to 6-6 and not lose the 2nd round pick.

 

[duke1861]

of course, b/c its obvious that Wentz is the better QB. lol

Are you serious or just trying to troll. You are doing the same thing you told skinsdad to stop doing. You literally have no proof that wentz would have won anything.
The overall team record under Falco is better than it is with Wentz. The team simply plays better with Falco. I have no clue why you don't understand simple concepts.
Nobody agrees with you...they never have.

 

[deanpet21]

Are you serious are just trying to troll. You are doing the same thing you told skinsdad to stop doing. You literally have no proof that wentz would have won anything.

he has no proof that TH would have won those 2 games. I just giving it back to him. Thats all. He made the excuse first that TH would have been 2-4 not me.

 

[duke1861]

he has no proof that TH would have won those 2 games. I just giving it back to him. Thats all. He made the excuse first that TH would have been 2-4 not me.

I understand that.

But you have to admit that it is hypocritical to tell someone to stop doing the same thing you are doing. Disagree all you want, it is an opinion board as you said, but you do the same thing you accuse skinsdad of doing.

I actually agree with skinsdad as well.

 

[skinsdad62]

no bs, plus you cant say we would be 2-4 with TH. You have no pay of proving that.

i most certainly can based on his 2 wins already and his record over the past 11 starts

 

[deanpet21]

I understand that.

But you have to admit that it is hypocritical to tell someone to stop doing the same thing you are doing. Disagree all you want, it is an opinion board as you said, but you do the same thing you accuse skinsdad of doing.

I actually agree with skinsdad as well.

he started it. of course, you agree with him. lol