• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Top 10 poll: #4 player ever

Who is the #4 player in baseball history?

  • Ken Griffey Jr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mike Schmidt

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pedro Martinez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alex Rodriguez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roberto Clemente

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Christy Mathewson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sadaharu Oh

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Frank Robinson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rickey Henderson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Josh Gibson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Johnny Bench

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Joe DiMaggio

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Satchel Paige

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roger Clemens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Greg Maddux

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tom Seaver

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jimmie Foxx

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Randy Johnson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Clayton Kershaw

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Andrew Jones

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Miguel Cabrera

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cal Ripken

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mariano Rivera

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

TheGoodMan19

Dealing with pronoun troubles
279
172
43
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Location
Buffalo, NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I've always had Big Train at the top, but I'll reconsider... Matthewson, Koufax, & Gibson also deserve to be in the convo....

And, I just noticed some people are adding Kershaw already! I need to update my analysis...
In his prime, I don't think anyone was more unhittable than Koufax. Lefty Grove is another candidate. He was dominant for years before he joined the A's when the gap between the high minors and majors was much closer. If factoring injuries, Mantle should be in the talk. Many said he had more God given talent than anyone
 

black francis

Well-Known Member
12,722
3,563
293
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
People picking players they never watched over barry
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
People picking players they never watched over barry
“Legend” is legit, imho. Voting against someone just because isn’t.

If someone truly believes Cobb or Wagner or Hornsby or (…) is better than Bonds, that is a valid opinion. But explain WHY. This whole thing is about discussion.
 

Janus

Well-Known Member
12,147
6,357
533
Joined
Oct 5, 2020
Location
here and there
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
sure but outside of those 5 seasons koufax was average at best... again, he is an enigma for me... but i do think his legend was over-stated more than anyone else in baseball history(leave room for my dramatic exaggerations)....
Outside his 5?, Koufax was better than average, he placed in the top 5 in strikeouts prior to his 1960 season and that was behind Drysdale for the top pitcher. As the #2 or even 3 pitcher, he remained one of the top strikeout leaders, that's better than average.
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
35,319
7,170
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Outside his 5?, Koufax was better than average, he placed in the top 5 in strikeouts prior to his 1960 season and that was behind Drysdale for the top pitcher. As the #2 or even 3 pitcher, he remained one of the top strikeout leaders, that's better than average.

thats one stat... 1961, which was his best season outside his top 5, his ERA was 3.52... 1961 is usually included in his consecutive 6 seasons... where i only said consecutive 5...

was average the wrong term?? maybe... but those seasons were not that great either... before 1961, his career ERA was 4.10
 

Shanemansj13

Finger Poppin Dat Pussy
115,461
35,653
1,033
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Location
Dallas
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,625.55
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
thats one stat... 1961, which was his best season outside his top 5, his ERA was 3.52... 1961 is usually included in his consecutive 6 seasons... where i only said consecutive 5...

was average the wrong term?? maybe... but those seasons were not that great either... before 1961, his career ERA was 4.10
Being elite for 5 years is great and he is still a top pitcher but it’s more impressive to havd those elite years and longevity like Gibson, Randy, Roger, Maddux, Seaver, and those old timers, etc. with long, dominant careers. That’s why he gets the knock. Still arguably one of the best lefties of all-time. He has no business being close to a top 5 or top 10 player of all-time…which is why he isn’t in the poll. Probably not a top 10 SP of all-time.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Being elite for 5 years is great and he is still a top pitcher but it’s more impressive to havd those elite years and longevity like Gibson, Randy, Roger, Maddux, Seaver, and those old timers, etc. with long, dominant careers. That’s why he gets the knock. Still arguably one of the best lefties of all-time. He has no business being close to a top 5 or top 10 player of all-time…which is why he isn’t in the poll. Probably not a top 10 SP of all-time.
He isn’t in the discussion for me for all the knocks mentioned in this thread. But he is a name who floats at the bottom part of the 35-list. Because of THIS discussion, I will probably put him back on the list for the #5 poll. Not because he belongs in the discussion for #5, but because I want to keep the bottom part of the poll rotating.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
38,993
11,626
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Kershaw is hands down a HOFer, but I personally don’t think he should even be mentioned until the 20s or so.
2.5 career ERA in the era he played in is kinda ridiculous. Weirdly of the modern pitchers his playoff numbers are also fairly legit.

Gibson is kinda interesting, too. It depends on how you feel about the era and mounds.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not to stop the natural progression of the discussion, but focusing on Koufax is slightly off topic, as everyone pretty much acknowledges that he isn’t in the discussion for #4.

Bonds looks to be a clear nominee for #4. But who else belongs in the discussion? Is this just Bonds’ spot? Or can an argument be made for Cobb or Aaron or Mantle or Bench or Handerson or (…)?
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
36,308
14,920
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Based on what? Not breaking a single baseball rule?
Based on the insane amount of PEDs he took. I've never seen a humans head grow that much as an adult and he completely transformed his body and his career. His cheating is the only thing putting him in this particular conversation. Aaron would have hit 1,000 HRs if he did the same
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Based on the insane amount of PEDs he took. I've never seen a humans head grow that much as an adult and he completely transformed his body and his career. His cheating is the only thing putting him in this particular conversation. Aaron would have hit 1,000 HRs if he did the same
Aaron hit 755 thanks to greenies, which were equally illegal in the game and in society as whatever Bonds took. You stumping for Aaron shows your lack of consistency in your argument.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
For clarification, there WILL be a runoff for this spot, no matter the final numbers in THIS poll. THIS poll (select 3) is not set up to decide a single winner, no matter the apparent landslide.
 

Hbomb

Mobile Member
2,218
617
113
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,800.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
sure but outside of those 5 seasons koufax was average at best... again, he is an enigma for me... but i do think his legend was over-stated more than anyone else in baseball history(leave room for my dramatic exaggerations)....
His 1961 wasn’t bad. Let the league in struck outs.

His first two seasons were only because he was a bonus baby and had to remain on the roster or because to another team.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
38,993
11,626
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not to stop the natural progression of the discussion, but focusing on Koufax is slightly off topic, as everyone pretty much acknowledges that he isn’t in the discussion for #4.

Bonds looks to be a clear nominee for #4. But who else belongs in the discussion? Is this just Bonds’ spot? Or can an argument be made for Cobb or Aaron or Mantle or Bench or Handerson or (…)?
With Williams off the board I think maybe an argument for Cobb and Hornsby entering the mix. Bonds on the board probably blocks Aaron, Clemens, and ARod unless you just arent voting for Bonds.

Maybe an argument for Mantle, Gehrig and Musial if we're checking boxes of success instead of just stats.
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
36,308
14,920
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Aaron hit 755 thanks to greenies, which were equally illegal in the game and in society as whatever Bonds took. You stumping for Aaron shows your lack of consistency in your argument.
The attempt to compare the massive amounts of PEDs taken by Bonds to the point that they completely changed his body and seemingly doubled his power to greenies with regards to the level of enhancement it gives you from a performance perspective is silly and that's if he even took them. I'll take your word that he did, but even if he did it still isn't in any way whatsoever similar.
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
35,319
7,170
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The attempt to compare the massive amounts of PEDs taken by Bonds to the point that they completely changed his body and seemingly doubled his power to greenies with regards to the level of enhancement it gives you from a performance perspective is silly and that's if he even took them. I'll take your word that he did, but even if he did it still isn't in any way whatsoever similar.


most of the anti-steroid debate comes from emotion and reality... we all knew it was happening and we all were for it... Until bonds broke beloved records with it... Hell, we were all ok with Mark Mcguire breaking Roger Maris' record... but when Bonds broke McGuire's record we couldnt handle that... and then he broke Hank Aaron's and it was hell to pay for steroids...


i truly do think if Bonds did not do steroids we would be looking at steroids a different way....and it would not be as villified...
 
  • Bullseye
Reactions: LHG

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,662
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The attempt to compare the massive amounts of PEDs taken by Bonds to the point that they completely changed his body and seemingly doubled his power to greenies with regards to the level of enhancement it gives you from a performance perspective is silly and that's if he even took them. I'll take your word that he did, but even if he did it still isn't in any way whatsoever similar.
It is the technology that was available at the time.

And Bonds had a doctor give him his stuff through Rx. So ARGUABLY Aaron’s use was WORSE than Bonds.

But I don’t use that argument against Aaron. He utilized technology that was available at the day and wasn’t illegal in the game.
 
Top