- Thread starter
- #1
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
Address in the draft: It’s a deep class of receivers, which would have been a good reason had they opted not to sign Jackson. Then again, this franchise hasn’t developed a quality receiver in quite some time. The Redskins could still use more young depth. Leonard Hankerson’s ACL surgery makes him a question mark. Aldrick Robinson is more than capable as a fourth or fifth receiver on the depth chart. Santana Moss is nearing the end and far from a lock to make the roster. If Hankerson doesn’t return early or takes time to get his game back, the Redskins would lose depth. One reason Washington did not want Andrew Hawkins, one source said, was because of his lack of height. If that’s the case, how many small receivers will Jay Gruden want to keep? (They also have Nick Williams, listed at 5-foot-10.) So adding a bigger receiver later in the draft remains a possibility, even if it’s as a developmental guy.
Notice the last sentence. Add a big WR LATER in the draft not at #34. This article was written by Kiem from ESPN. The article closes with the main thing is too keep RG3 upright and give him protection. So that means o line help to me.
Notice the last sentence. Add a big WR LATER in the draft not at #34. This article was written by Kiem from ESPN. The article closes with the main thing is too keep RG3 upright and give him protection. So that means o line help to me.