Red_Alert
^^ Privileged ^^
I agree that we always rank well, but those rankings are based on average number of "stars" per recruit. USC still gets 4 and 5 star recruits, but we don't get as many because of the sanctions. When one of those 4 and 5 star recruits gets injured or simply doesn't pan out, then there isn't anyone to step in to replace them like there is when we have 85 scholarship players.
Example, as I pointed out earlier, Silas Redd has been out for the 1st 2 games because of recovering from knee surgery. The running back that is starting in his place is a converted linebacker and the guy backing him up is a true freshman!!
Trust me, when the sanctions came down, I figured that we'd skate through them relatively unscathed because of the level of talent that we bring in. However, I didn't count on the depth issue. Many of the offenses that we play against are designed to create depth issues for a team with 85 scholarship players. It creates even more of a depth issue with 67 scholarship players!!
It's easy to blame Kiffin because of all of the SEC hate for him and he certainly doesn't do himself any favors with his big, idiot mouth!! But when you look past that and see the true effect of the sanctions, it paints a little bit different picture.
Again, imagine your 'Huskers with 18 fewer scholarship players and think about what they'd look like!!
I know what you're saying.
Also Nebraska always has a few good walk-ons that contribute every year. So if they had USC's talent with those walk-on's filling the holes I'd think they'd be better. Problem is Nebraska's coaching staff is suspect as well.
Most blame Kiffin because he's never accomplished anything at the level of HC before. It's kind of a "show me" thing.