- Thread starter
- #481
saddles
No More "Bullpen Failure"
Makes sense with how crowded the organization is at 3B. I hope we are starting to shift guys around well before they come up here when it is likely to be needed.
You continue to impress me with your stupidity. That was not the consensus on LSB at all.I can’t believe how stupid people are on LSB.
the consensus on there is that signing Odor was a good move when they did and they always defend odor when people attack him on there.
we’re talking about the same guy who has been statistically the worst regular player in MLB 2x in the last 3 years?
I wish odor wouldn’t be on a different team. I dislike him more than I ever disliked mitch.
That was my take on a general basis in conjunction with offering contracts. I do think at some point it is prudent to take the loss. Just not nowYou continue to impress me with your stupidity. That was not the consensus on LSB at all.
The consensus was that buying out a young players arbitration years has a greater than a 50% chance to work out in favor of the team. If you have a greater than 50% chance of winning a coin flip, you’d probably bet a decent amount of money on that coin flip. Or would be the moron complaining about 4 lost coin flips even though you won the other 6?
Teams are still aggressively pursuing that strategy. MLB Teams Reportedly Pursuing Pre-Arb Extension Blitz
Very encouraging re a Apostel. Yet he is still not a high ranking prospect in all MLB. Hope that changes
You continue to impress me with your stupidity. That was not the consensus on LSB at all.
The consensus was that buying out a young players arbitration years has a greater than a 50% chance to work out in favor of the team. If you have a greater than 50% chance of winning a coin flip, you’d probably bet a decent amount of money on that coin flip. Or would be the moron complaining about 4 lost coin flips even though you won the other 6?
Teams are still aggressively pursuing that strategy. MLB Teams Reportedly Pursuing Pre-Arb Extension Blitz
I wonder if the success teams had in arbitration hearings this year will have any effect on that tactic?You continue to impress me with your stupidity. That was not the consensus on LSB at all.
The consensus was that buying out a young players arbitration years has a greater than a 50% chance to work out in favor of the team. If you have a greater than 50% chance of winning a coin flip, you’d probably bet a decent amount of money on that coin flip. Or would be the moron complaining about 4 lost coin flips even though you won the other 6?
Teams are still aggressively pursuing that strategy. MLB Teams Reportedly Pursuing Pre-Arb Extension Blitz
That was my take on a general basis in conjunction with offering contracts. I do think at some point it is prudent to take the loss. Just not now
Yeah, consistency is needed. That is why I never complained about Elvis underperforming. I was all for his extension, so I never felt like I had the right to complain.Very true, had we waited and he blown up in a good way, he'd be calling them stupid for not extending when he was cheaper
Yeah, consistency is needed. That is why I never complained about Elvis underperforming. I was all for his extension, so I never felt like I had the right to complain.
one of our candidates for 2B just hit a grand slam.
Ha trolling has become a two way street re Odor.
Shhhhhhhhh
It’s only Spring Training
For the same reason why can't Solak and Guzman do the same? Perfect time to see what these young players have to offer. Without regular time they will never be as good as they might have been.I mean most people know we aren't really going to be that competitive this year, so why isn't anyone willing to see if Santana can get better in CF with regular playing time, like DDJ did once upon a time?
I mean most people know we aren't really going to be that competitive this year, so why isn't anyone willing to see if Santana can get better in CF with regular playing time, like DDJ did once upon a time?
Back when the Rangers were winning and on top of the world in 2010 and 2011, I had close friends both on the team and working in the clubhouse. I was fortunate enough to get to spend some time with the players and their families during those years, and even more fortunate to hear insider talk and gossip when it was just the wives or families talking to one another.No matter where the blame belongs, it is ownership that needs to be replaced. They are either to blame, or they are allowing the one to blame to continue to be employed by the club. New ownership can get the present owners and JD in a meeting together and find out who made which decisions and take action if necessary. Most likely a clean sweep would be made.