i hope he does wellI am anxious to see how all 5 of our top pitching prospects advance through the system this year. I will be keeping an eye on a former prospect in the Phillies organization, as well.
complained about the difficulty at least some owners have affording teams
I as a fan have a vested interest and prior emotional investment in Baseball aka the national pastimeThis is, has always been, and will always be 100% Grade-A bullshit.
The movie "Forrest Gump" made $678 million on a budget of $55 million. The author of the book signed a deal for % of the net (instead of gross) profits, and the movie studio used "Hollywood accounting" to say that the movie ended up losing money as a way to avoid paying him a % of the take.
Same bullshit with MLB owners. They're lying about the finances (or they are idiots who can't print money with a money printer).
Either way, not our fucking problem.
actually, it takes 2 for a lockout and the players are as much to blame as the ownersEvan Drellich reported this:
In a meeting with the Players Association on Monday, Major League Baseball deputy commissioner Dan Halem said that MLB is willing to lose games over some of the outstanding issues the sides have, people with knowledge of the talks said. Whether Halem was issuing a threat, or merely providing a statement of the obvious — the owners did start a lockout, after all, and there’s been no agreement since, so what else would happen if there’s no movement? — depends on whom you ask. Some on the players’ side indeed thought it was notable that Halem would verbalize the possibility of missing games, that it did amount to a threat, while the commissioner’s office disagreed.
Some on the players’ side were irked, too, by Rockies owner Dick Monfort, the chair of commissioner Rob Manfred’s seven-owner labor policy committee. Monfort, people with knowledge of the meeting said, complained about the difficulty at least some owners have affording teams, and the ancillary costs of ownership such as security and COVID-19 measures.
Glen Caplin, a former political operative who serves as MLB’s spokesperson for collective bargaining, wrote in a statement that The Athletic’s “reporting about comments from our negotiating session is mischaracterized and not a fair representation of the discussion.”
“We think the parties’ decision not to have a public back and forth and keep our discussions private has been a positive,” Caplin said. “It’s unfortunate that someone has chosen a different path and we are going to remain focused on making an agreement.”
For as much arguing as there was in the roughly two-hour meeting at the union’s offices — and arguing in collective bargaining is not abnormal — the meeting also probably represented the most positive step the sides have taken in months.
actually, it takes 2 for a lockout and the players are as much to blame as the owners
not siding with eitherrule #1: never side with the billionaires
They had Leiter in their pocket too, right?
At least this time Suzuki wouldn't have to go back and play for free if the Red Sox do not get him. Lol. That was such a ridiculous scenario that folks expected to play out with Leiter and the Red Sox.They had Leiter in their pocket too, right?
Double standard allowing Ortiz in. Really a Sham all the politics in all of this.
A shame for Schilling.