Survivor

[MilkSpiller22]

But she was in a good position the whole way, what incentive did she have to “shake things up”?

And she was in a good position all game because of her loyalty.

 

[calsnowskier]

And she was in a good position all game because of her loyalty.

Exactly why a vote for the winner is stupid for the GAME, but critical for the SHOW.

 

[All-Star Benchwarmer]

And she was in a good position all game because of her loyalty.

Loyalty, lapdog, tomato, tomato...

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Exactly why a vote for the winner is stupid for the GAME, but critical for the SHOW.

I don’t follow. Even if there are different ways to play a game there are going to be better players playing a better game.

There are many strategies. But it’s the execution that wins.

The loyalty game is great. But it has its flaws. For example, it doesn’t help jury management.

Sue’s problem was that she only played the loyal game. That was her only game. She barely talked to people outside of her alliances.

So only her alliances understood her game.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Loyalty, lapdog, tomato, tomato...

Actually her loyalty game was doing the dirty job. Actually surprised that it was Rachel who hid in the bushes and listened to the group. Would have guessed that would have been sue.