The question is why give up assets and cap when you only have to give up cap ? Our wrs are not an issue at all at this pointObtaining a resource like Higgins opposite Tmac is just what this offense needs. I know, the defense is struggling. No shit! It would be long term as stated he is 25. Another important piece on offense, thus allowing AP to focus on the defense next off season. I agree that you have to look at the big picture and building a team is not simply moving pieces on a chess board. You have to know how to really play the game using all strategies to do so.
Trust me, if analytically or financially obtaining Higgins doesn't make sense, AP & Co won't do it. If it does in their long-term vision of making this team a competitor year in and year out for Superbowl's, then a deadline deal will be made. We shall see.
He got fooled a couple of times , he got off some blocks well and he showed hustle
Tee Higgins may or may not be a sure thing , certainly he isn’t going anywhere this year . The thing is I don’t need to trade assets for him when he will be available next off sea
May or may not??? C'mon man!!
Tee Higgins is 25 years old.Giving up draft capital and signing a 30 year old player who appears to have character issues to a huge deal so he can help you right now would be the definition of a quick fix no?
Pretty sure he’s referring to Hassan hereTee Higgins is 25 years old.
Gotcha lol, and yes I am awareYep, but the ongoing debate over draft capital and money is about Higgins.
Yep, but the ongoing debate over draft capital and money is about Higgins.
Spot on man! This guy is still only 25 years old, a seasoned top notch veteran and as you've mentioned, a cost/ benefit bonanza.Tee Higgins is good enough to be a first round pick. His expense means i do not give up a first. I would do a third for sure and could be convinced of a second.
Look around the league dad. Every team worth their salt has a decent 1-2 at WR and sometimes even a 3rd. While we are competitive at this point. if adding pieces to improve now, you do it. Not wait around until a possible 2nd - 5th round WR is selected and you hope pans out. Sometimes you have to give up assets to gain assets. Our WR's are ok but outside Tmac, it's a stretch to say we couldn't use a Higgins.The question is why give up assets and cap when you only have to give up cap ? Our wrs are not an issue at all at this point
I too questioned this during the game. Ertz is NOT his pro bowl self anymore and lacks any burst. I have been begging for Sinnott to take more reps so he can something.
Spot on man! This guy is still only 25 years old, a seasoned top notch veteran and as you've mentioned, a cost/ benefit bonanza.
I'm not sure about that 2nd though. How about if we agree on a conditional 3rd?