- Thread starter
- #201
The opportunity IS there and any cost/benefit analysis supports this move. Remember, he's a top-flight WR on most teams, 25 years old, not seeking an exorbitant annual salary, can be signed for the same amount of time that your rookie QB has left on his contract, won't cost more than a third-round pick to acquire. Would be in place when your current top receiver is either moved or retired (TM turns 31 next September 15th). It's an exceptional return for a third-round pick. (even with the cost added to re-sign him) Give me a brief look at your CBA.The
Opportunity isn’t there and knowing when to strike and when not to is important . We talked about Deshawn Watson and look at that fiasco . Would have set the franchise back 1/2 a decade .
By a simple cost / benefit analysis is doesn’t pay