- Thread starter
- #861
I was just wondering if anybody is keeping track this post-season regarding how many times teams have been successful scoring a goal with the extra attacker (i.e. goalie pulled). The success rate seems to be very high in these playoffs.
And in this particular case, both goalies were pulled, so I think that counts as 2 for 2.
I was just wondering if anybody is keeping track this post-season regarding how many times teams have been successful scoring a goal with the extra attacker (i.e. goalie pulled). The success rate seems to be very high in these playoffs.
My calculations say Disco Dan Bylsma needs to win two of the next three games to save his job (and the Pens have regained home ice advantage). Pittsburgh is still in pretty good shape.
My calculations say Disco Dan Bylsma needs to win two of the next three games to save his job (and the Pens have regained home ice advantage). Pittsburgh is still in pretty good shape.
It could go either way. Yes, the Pens have home ice, but it hasn't meant much in this series. The Jackets are riding a wave of momentum and Fleury has proven that he can wilt at the most inopportune moments. That doesn't bode well for the Penguins if they keep getting down 3-1 and their room for error is less and less.
My calculations say Disco Dan Bylsma needs to win two of the next three games to save his job (and the Pens have regained home ice advantage). Pittsburgh is still in pretty good shape.
Tanking for Trotz
I'm thinking they may disagree with that. Aside from these short segments where Pittsburgh scores 3 goals in 6 minutes, Columbus has controlled a huge portion of this series.
If Columbus can manage to play for more than 54 minutes a game, they could be in great shape.
lol - I just realized Trotz is almost an anagram of Torts.
That's where Disco Dan needs to turn things around and say, "Guys, we're tied 2-2 in this series and we've played maybe 40 minutes of good hockey. How about a full 60 minutes for a change?"
That's like a whole series worth in one game, surely you jest.
Nucks haven't cut him loose, yet... have they?
I think Trevor Linden is deciding on the next Vancouver GM before he (or his GM hire) cuts Torts loose.
lol - I just realized Trotz is almost an anagram of Torts.
That's where Disco Dan needs to turn things around and say, "Guys, we're tied 2-2 in this series and we've played maybe 40 minutes of good hockey. How about a full 60 minutes for a change?"
I'm really hoping that this is Danny B's last ride with Pittsburgh, regardless of what happens the remainder of this series. He doesn't deserve any more chances to get the job done here. His best season was arguably the 10/11 season when he coached them without Sid and Geno. Maybe that's what he's meant for. A team without any superstars and a bunch of players that are in the mold of what Dan was while he was in the NHL.
The guy I would really like to see replace him is Lavy
From a fellow goalie's point of view, I think MAF has a very clear understanding of the D in front of him. I don't think his issue is a lack of confidence, I think it's a "I have/want to be the difference" state of mind. Both often lead to the same result, but I can't say he has no confidence. He's not making bad plays, but he's making plays with the mindset that his D is not going to come through the front and clear anything out for him. Or one is going to turn looking for a break, leaving his partner outnumbered behind the net.
On the tying goal, it was clear that the Jackets were going to beat the Pens to the puck, and he had exactly 3 milliseconds to decide what to do, and it went wrong for him (ask any goalie. It usually does). But in my mind if he has no confidence, he curls under the crossbar and points to his left where the puck is going. I gave my son a coaching lesson right there in the family room. Had MAF got his pads against the boards and not tried to stop it with only his stick, it's a 3-1 series. That's the margin of error we work with.
On the winner, Foligno crossed the line and looked like he was going to go down the boards and cut in, so Fluery set up on the right side of Niskanen. Nick shot quicker than anyone expected and MAF went with him, but he was still off a smidge and the knuckler got by him. But he was on top of his crease, square (relatively) and just missed a tiny bit. His style and his D's style just aren't meshing right now.
The Pens need more Scuderi's and less Letangs, or Fleury needs to just lay back and let the D handle everything.
By the way, they interviewed Wiz and he said that as they were coming back into the room after tying in regulation Nick stood in the middle of the room and asked if anyone minded if he went out and scored the game winner, because he "wanted to".
I love that guy.
When they asked Foligno about it later he just said "I say crap like that all the time. I can't believe it actually worked."
I mean REALLY love that guy.