Heatles84
Well-Known Member
Parker is not a pure pg
I'm curious in what sense do you think Parker when in his hey day didn't fit as a pure PG.
Parker is not a pure pg
Buy his ass out, play our 2017-18 season without this problem child taking up a roster spot, show him the grass ain't greener on the other side, and get a free lottery pick.
But you ok with with teams doing players any kind of way, huh?
PG-13 would be the replacement for Russell. They can attend to other needs with the draft.
I see Wiggy is on line
I'm curious in what sense do you think Parker when in his hey day didn't fit as a pure PG.
Yes. The individual is not bigger than the organization. I say wait until August 1st and just buy him out and destroy his image That way, free agents will have already been signed an team's cap space will have already been used, leaving PC13 ("PC" is for "problem child") with limited options to sign.
This may have been discussed already, but isn't the difference between a dick move and doing a solid about PG going public with it? Shouldn't he have just privately gone to the new GM and said I'm not re-signing here so do what you need to do? The dick move isn't leaving it's doing so publicly which kills Indiana's leverage.
Who said anything about who's bigger? The point is, you have no problem how these teams have no loyalty towards players, but is mad at PG for being honest.
So what about the dick moves these team pull with the players?
He's more of a scorer. Steve Nash and Kidd were pure pgs.
First of all, it wasn't PG being honest. It was his agent delivering a message about him to the Pacers. What the Pacers need to do is call up George himself and make him meet eye-to-eye with the organization's representatives on it. The agent's word means jack, for he is not under contract with the Pacers.
Back to your original point, the Pacers are not obligated to let their trade talks known with him. On the flip side, if I personally went to my boss and made it known to him that I was planning to leave and join a rival organization, he would have every right to fire me.
That goes back to my original point that if these reports are in fact true, I would make the bold move and cut his ass on August 1st if there's no decent trade offer before then. Paul George is not bigger than the organization, and his reputation would take a major hit if the Pacers were to simply cut him. Not going to happen, but it should.
This may have been discussed already, but isn't the difference between a dick move and doing a solid about PG going public with it? Shouldn't he have just privately gone to the new GM and said I'm not re-signing here so do what you need to do? The dick move isn't leaving it's doing so publicly which kills Indiana's leverage.
And this is why I felt that the criticism of Lebron when he signed with Miami or when he went back to Cleveland was unwarranted
Same with Durant signing with Golden State
This is America - Lebron and Durant did what any of us have the right to do - choose where you want to work
Good for them
I'm going to lmao if he goes elsewhere next summer.
NBA Trade Rumors: Lakers reportedly won't give up young assets for Paul George
Did he go public or did his message to Indy management get leaked?