terpsfball09
Crabcakes and ACL tears
Not yet. I doubt I ever will
Not yet. I doubt I ever will
Nothin at all. I haven't spoke to him since he went back to work monday. If there were noteworthy plans I'm sure he'd tell me. But I'm still hoping for morales.
Our lack of depth on defense scares. There is a lot of confusion with our defensive coverage at times and some egregious turnovers. It'll be nice getting Daley back to help solidify that unit.
I love connautons natural tools and offensive prowess, especially his skating and rocket shot, but he seems a little unbridled angel times. His turnover against Oshie can't happen at this level. Gaunce just doesn't belong up here yet and looks overwhelmed at times.
This might be the best skating stars team that I can remember. And actually, the way this team is constructed reminds me of the 2010 rangers because of the youth and high upside. Although, this stars group still has some growing to do.....
Goli is looking much better. When Daley gets back I think it'll look much better. Gonchar will be back in the next couple days. I know he isn't playing that wel, but he's better than connauton and gaunce. Hopefully, if we're lucky, Robidas will be back in a few months. If we have him, Daley, Goli, Gonchar, and Dillon, we'll be alright. It will still only be average-below average, but it won't be cowboys bad. We gotta use our pick this year to get a good defensemen. A big guy that is good at blocking shots and finishing checks would be preferred. That's what Weber and Pietrangelo are so good at. We got a bunch of guys that can actually play defense, but there are so many other aspects that we lack in like that.
Stars games are so fun. I know this is a rangers board, but I would rather go to a stars game than a rangers game any day of the week. People dont understand hockey until they see it in person. Holy shit though... connauton almost cost us again. We got too many young guys on defense that we're relying on to be great, however none of them (barring dylan of course) are really big bodies like what is becoming so popular now. All the great young defensemen are huge, love checking, have a wicked slap shot, block shots like no other, and control the puck better than anyone else on the team. We really don't have a guy like that and I don't see any of our young guys becoming that either. That's why I said we should draft a guy like that early. I don't know what the draft pool looks like, but I think if there is a big defensemen that fits this resume then we should take him. I think that our first line is set for many many years. I think we have 4 good centers. Chiasson, Scevior, Eakin, Roussel and garbutt will all be solid players. Not great, probably not all stars, but solid players. We really don't have THAT many open voids to fill that can't be filled in free agency. You have around 12 forwards/centers on each team that play (4 lines x 3) and since we already have our first line set and I just gave you 5 more names, that's only really 4 holes. I realize I'm looking at it from a very simplistic standpoint, but I think our best move right now is to let our team develop. If we make a move at the deadline, it should be trading away erik cole to get some young talent and a conditional pick. He has proven he can still score goals and distribute the puck at a pretty good level. I think we can get a prospect or two and a conditional pick for him, considering how weak the deadline talent will be. Then, ya just gotta let the kids develop. We now have enough money to make a splash in the offseason. I personally think this team is two years and one more great player away from being one of the best in the west. If they got another player that has first line talent and we put him on the second line to lead the charge after whitney retires and chiasson is developed then we have an extremely potent first two lines. Then we got our powerful, scrappy checking line with Fiddler and Garbutt, so you;d be looking at line 3 to fill with younger talent. Eakin would be the center, and you'd put two young guys around him, one of them probably being Sceaviour.
I think this offseason we go out and use our available money to make a splash and get a defenseman that is a leader in the clubhouse as well as on the ice. A guy that, during the power play, can lead the charge from behind his own net and always be a slap shot threat.
One thing I noticed about st louis is that they could have 2 guys pressing on the forecheck. We only have 1. Why did they have two when we only have one? (usually Seguin or Nichushkin) because their defense is so damn good that if they get the puck past the forecheck the defense will always be there to stop them. Our defense is so bad that we need that extra winger in the back to help. This puts them at a serious advantage because it can confuse line changes and rush the other team to take them out of their game plan. That's why I think a great defenseman is so important. Most stanley cup winners have great goalies and great defenses. We don't have that yet. When the kids develop and we use our extra funds though... yikes
Not sure why you think we need size on defense. Oleksiak is 6'7", and Dillon, Nemeth, and Jokipakka are all 6'3"-6'4". If anything, they need a quick offensive-type on the blue line to QB the power play (what Goligoski was supposed to be).
Garbutt and Roussel are nothing more than checking line wingers. Eakin is a 3rd line center. The Stars still need a legit 2nd line Center and maybe even a 2nd line winger, depending on how Ritchie develops.
Well see that was one of my points. I think we're relying on too many young guys to be stars when we know they won't be. I do think though that we need that guy to police the powerplay from behind our own net
I'll admit I don't know a lot about the guys that aren't in the NHL, but I do know that our defense is terrible. They drove me crazy last night with how many they turned over. A lot of the problems has to do with Daley and Robidas being out, but neither of them are young.
I would say that both of you are correct. I think we need a center and defenseman early in the draft. I would take the best one available, whichever it is.
Just read that we have the 4th ranked farm system in the NHL. But you are right. Most things I read say that we need centers... which is a bit odd to me, but when I think about it, some of our centers will likely be off the team in the next two years. Fiddler has personally asked to be traded. Peverly is likely to be traded as well. Erik Cole will bring in a decent haul. If there are 3 guys we trade, it will be among that group. All reports say that we can get good prospects for Peverly and Cole.
A pretty decent FA class next year too. Names that jump out are Coaiacovo, Andrei Markov and Paul Statsny. We have the tools to make a trade if we really want. But its not even worth it I don't think. We have a great team now, but not stanley cup great. We should trade 2 out of 3 of our old forwards(peverly fiddler and cole) to get a pick and some good prospects. Then we'll be in a good place money and prospects to make a splash this offseason just like last year. We can afford to make a couple of trades and still have a great farm if we add to it with some trades at the deadline.
I'll be at the game tonight. Montreal is pretty good. Seems like we never get a sure win anymore. Great seats too, 5 rows behind montreal's bench. Sure as shit wont be bringing a horn though