Why would you not give a first for Wallace? Even if he is not THE best, he is a top 3 WR in the league and we ****** need WR's like BAD?
It's not like we are giving up a 1st for an iffy player. This is an insanely good receiver we are talking about here.
I'll be happy with either getting Wallace, Vjax, Colston. You take what you get, they are all great WR's. We are not going anywhere without improvement at the WR position so If I was a GM I'd be dealing out that 1st rounder and going after Wallace. None of these guys are going to be cheap and this team is thinking Super Bowl this year. Go for it. This is not a time to be conservative
Top 3 receiver in the league? So Calvin, then Fitzgerald, then Wallace?
Wallace probably doesn't even crack my top 10, I'd probably have him around 15.