Bemular
New Member
My questions are just that, questions. You made some statements and I asked you to support them. You have said everyone except Crabtree has improved. Back that up with evidence. You love to talk stats, shouldn't be too hard to support such apparently obvious claims. Who has improved and by how much relative to Crabtree? Who has had success and how much relative to Crabtree? You stated your opinion, I'm asking you to support it.
Now, I did state a few opinions in there. Since you're a bit shaky on identifying opinions, I'll help you out:
Davis gets open often because he is a physical mismatch. Davis is nearly unstoppable down the seam, and Smith throws that pass well.
Crabtree is not a great receiver. He does not have great physical tools. He had not developed tools that can be developed. He has been better, comparatively, than one of the weakest-armed QBs to ever start an NFL game.
Smith is not very good throwing to the sidelines. Smith is not very good at throwing the slant. Crabtree is hurt to some extent because Smith struggles throwing these balls.
Then we have some questions (see above).
Morgan's statistical performance has not improved very much, and certainly not much given the context (first three and a half years in the league, moving from backup to starter).
If you disagree with any of those, feel free to point it out and explain why you disagree. If you don't want to, don't. But don't accuse people of moving the goal posts and then weasel your way out of answering direct questions. That's pretty chickenshit.
I'll take your becoming a dick as your concession that you have nothing rational or intelligent to add to this discussion. Last night it was Southern and now tonight it's me - you have some serious problems Crimsoncrew.
The hilarious part of this is our opinions are probably not that different. I was simply attempting to present a different way to look at the facts and that is all it took to send you over the edge - kind of sad.