No I wasn’t. You’re speaking to an adjustment Kingsbury made with a back up that he was unwilling to employ with Murray.
Now you have gotten to the root of the problem, Murray should be spending his time getting that idiot fired.
I’m sorry that you don’t have the depth to understand how an analogy works. I invoked that analogy to point out the innate discrepancy inside of what is just and what is legal. I purposefully used a dramatic comparative to establish that point as all in 2022 can see the discrepancy through the example of a difference between that which is just and that which is legal. The system has made it “legal” for ownership to regularly go back on their word and not honor what they’ve promised to honor. It’s disingenuous to lean on legalities when those legalities create an unjust system to begin with. Are you under the impression that I used my example to establish that NFL players are slaves? That was not the intent at all and that should be clear to all who understand how analogies work.
Another guy who can’t handle an analogy
Stay inside your safe box of limited thinking. It’s safe there. My analogy was clear to begin with and I offered another post providing further context to the analogy. It’s cool you don’t get it. That’s evident in your closing statement about it being a slap in the face to actual slaves. That’s evidence of you taking something that is clearly provided in a figurative sense and attempting to dismiss that by reducing it to the literal. No biggie tons of people do that.lol
Another guy trying to defend a point that he'swrong about using a stupid, nonsensical analogy and then trying to claim others "don't understand" when it's pointed out the analogy is stupid and nonsensical.
What a slap in the face to actual slaves.
The only way I’ve “diminished” real slavery is if someone is so limited that they can’t wrap their head around the purpose and intent of an analogy and they take the statement literally. This isn’t a me problem.Keep making nonsensical "analogies" that diminish real slavery just to try to save a failed narrative...it's great look for you.
Seems like a bargain unless Gilmore’s skills have diminished. I didn’t follow his season closely last year. But in my mind he’s still one of the best corners in the league
Nope. Didn’t do that. I crafted an analogy to point out the difference between a standard of what is just vs a standard of what is legal. The only way what you’re accusing me of is applicable is if the analogy is taken literally. Analogies aren’t designed to be taken literally.
Good thing I didn’t call NFL players slaves.
