jarntt
Well-Known Member
PE1, you are as unbiased as an editor of the New York Times.
Read again what I wrote. Here, let me spell it for you:
B-e-a-s-l-e-y f-i-l-l-e-d h-i-s r-o-l-e o-n t-h-e C-o-w-b-o-y-s t-e-n t-i-m-e-s b-e-t-t-e-r t-h-a-n C-o-o-p-e-r f-i-l-l-e-d h-i-s r-o-l-e f-o-r t-h-e E-a-g-l-e-s.
Here's another thing that you might want to take into account in the future - it might just keep you from saying dumb things and getting into these senseless arguments: Actually read what a person wrote before responding to it. You incessantly (that means you keep on doing it) add or subtract words to what a person wrote and then respond to your new version of what the person wrote.
I can do that, too? Watch...
Why would you say that Pepsi is better than Coca-Cola? Everyone know that Coke is the number one selling cola on the market. You've lost all credibility now, PE1.
Oh, wait, you said Dez is better than Maclin? My bad!
Ouch, that reminded me of this:
"I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too"