dtgold88
Well-Known Member
they don't say otherwise. I get you think all things watson bad and all things Watson accusers good.20 plus settlements say otherwise. Come on dude. Stop pretending this guy isn't guilty.
they don't say otherwise. I get you think all things watson bad and all things Watson accusers good.20 plus settlements say otherwise. Come on dude. Stop pretending this guy isn't guilty.
Thank God Deshaun wasn't caught on video begging women to stick their fingers up his asz and doing the "happy baby" yoga pose. This is how he should forever be remembered:Ray was caught on video.
But he wasn't convicted, so per futballiscool, he shouldn't have been suspended.Ray was caught on video.
If it's equal I believe the NFL lets it go.Then they have an equal amount screaming the process is a sham. I think NFL can simply say they wanted a year (or indefinite past a year) but will abide by the former judge's ruling.
will they? Who knows.
there aint that many browns fansIf it's equal I believe the NFL lets it go.
Now do you think the screams will be equal?
But he wasn't convicted, so per futballiscool, he shouldn't have been suspended.
No, sorry. Your agenda is obvious and your constant attempting to throw it the other way is not believed by anyone here no matter how many times you do it and honestly makes you look like an idiot. Watson assaulted/harassed these women and even a cursory knowledge of the law would tell you his not being formally charged doesn't say otherwise.they don't say otherwise. I get you think all things watson bad and all things Watson accusers good.
Then, basically, that renders this part of the CBA useless, which I can't see the NFL/RG agreeing to never add to something they disagree with.
If it were not legal, no way the NFLPA would have allowed it to be a part of the CBA - so, like I keep saying - they can kick and scream all they want, but they agreed to the language, it was cleared by their lawyers, and now they may be faced with having to deal with that fallout.
Thank God Deshaun wasn't caught on video begging women to stick their fingers up his asz and doing the "happy baby" yoga pose. This is how he should forever be remembered:
View attachment 303781
If my man goes to jail he is fucked...literally and repeatedly...but, I'm guessing that would be fine with him
Have you heard of the term solicitation?Asking isn't a crime.
Yes, and it is not exclusively illegal.Have you heard of the term solicitation?
Go read some of Futballiscool reason why Watson should appeal the 6 games.Ray's charges were dropped due to completion of an anger management course. Apples/oranges.
It is in Texas.Yes, and it is not exclusively illegal.
Go read some of Futballiscool reason why Watson should appeal the 6 games.
It is in Texas.
You said "asking isn't a crime"Yes, and it is not exclusively illegal.
In very interested to see what this does to precedent of the league doesn't appeal
Basically the rulingv equates to 1 quarter suspended per accuser, even if you up that to 1 game is still awful publicly
So if a guy has 1 accuser next year and gets 4 games he now has precedentv to appeal OR to file a lawsuit
When i first heard the ruling i thought it was light but i was like 50/50 on whether the league would appeal but as I've sat here and thought about what this means going forward i just don't see how they can't
Say another guy faces a Big Ben type accusation next year and he settles ouy of court with no charges then the league suspends him for 1 game for potentially raping someone ( as that's the new precedent )
How does that play out publicly??
I just can't see it