dtgold88
Well-Known Member
This is close to a lie by you but not quite. When have I ever said him not being charged means he is not guilty of anything?No, sorry. Your agenda is obvious and your constant attempting to throw it the other way is not believed by anyone here no matter how many times you do it and honestly makes you look like an idiot. Watson assaulted/harassed these women and even a cursory knowledge of the law would tell you his not being formally charged doesn't say otherwise.
I simply said you believe anything you hear against Watson and dismiss anything that supports him.
me - "they could likely justify anything from no suspension to a year or longer"
It's almost as though I don't know and think either side could be in the right or the wrong. But the former judge made her ruling based on the evidence presented to her.