What are you even talking about? It's a proven fact that OSU would've beaten Miami in regulation if replay was allowed back then.
If that is the case, then why were you so concerned that I used "three exclamation points", in my comment #914?
I mean, sure, we still had time to still win the game and did still take the lead, but to think that call was right is just absurd.
I know, it's wild to think guys who have dedicated their entire lives to a sport, as a player or analyst, would have even the foggiest idea of what the rules are. It's obviously much more valid coming from an anonymous poster on a message board.
But he has long blonde braided hair! Btw, what’s with all the black makeup on players faces?
What made it worse is that they overturned the call on the field. If they had ruled it incomplete on the field, fine. I wouldn't like it, but replay should need unquestionable proof on a play to overturn. That clearly did not.
The rues analyst made no sense. 3 steps is 3 steps. Doesn't matter whether real time or slow mo. To suggest otherwise just made him seem like a dufus.
At the very least it's up there with the worst.
If Lawrence doesn't crouch down, we're talking about an amazing, clean hit. The refs should never think it's OK to completely change the outcome of a play based on a decision made by a ball carrier.
OK, but in general it does not and that's what was implied.
