shopson67
Well-Known Member
Moses Brown is the future!!!!
I'll admit I'm intrigued by him. Would've been a good reason to watch OKC, which I avoided lol.
Moses Brown is the future!!!!
You must have missed some of his games with OKC before they shut him down.Time-traveling back to 2019, lol.
It would be funny if this was the best player of the three in years aheadMoses Brown is the future!!!!
Celts wanted him vs pick 16With regards to the 1st round pick that Boston lost, Moses Brown represents very comparable value in terms of potential and cost to that pick... it's basically a wash.
You haven't factored in the financial side of the equation to your analysis here... getting rid of Kemba's awful contract was Boston's main and overriding goal... and whoever the trading partner ended up being, they were gonna need to be compensated for taking on that bad contract.Many problems I have with this trade.
1. Why give up Kemba AND a 1st? Horford and Brown are NOT worth Kemba and a 1st in any year or any reality. Would OKC really not JUST take Kemba and the 2nd for Horford, a backup C and another 2nd? Seems like they definitely gave away too much for this trade...
You haven't factored in the financial side of the equation to your analysis here... getting rid of Kemba's awful contract was Boston's main and overriding goal... and whoever the trading partner ended up being, they were gonna need to be compensated for taking on that bad contract.
^ This is neither in dispute nor is it the point... again, the C's did not make this trade to "upgrade" from Kemba Walker to Al Horford.they just needed to properly offset it.
kemba is a much better player than al at this point...
^ This is simply untrue.... and is less underwater on his contract.
No, it is.^ This is neither in dispute nor is it the point... again, the C's did not make this trade to "upgrade" from Kemba Walker to Al Horford.
^ This is simply untrue.
If we're not going anywhere with Kemba Walker... (and we're not)... then that point alone disproves your analysis here.No, it is.
this trade reeks of desperation.
Unless you get Bradley Beal next summer, it is a major major mistake.
At least 75% of NBA franchises would be glad to trade their current position for the "desperate" situation of the Celtics.
But is it really a bad contract if Kemba comes back fully healthy next year and does his usual 20 PPG, All-Star type year? Because to me, I'd rather have a healthy Kemba on my roster over anything. Not to mention, at a GM, I would not be giving up not only an All-Star PG but also a 1st round pick? That's craziness to me. I don't see how the Celtics win this trade unless they are able to sign a huge free agent with the money that they saved by giving up on Kemba after a bad, injury filled year. Now if tests and whatnot done on his left knee showed some serious damage and that's just not being said or publicized, then that's a different story because Kemba then wouldn't be back to his normal healthy productive years. I hope Kemba goes off next year for OKC.You haven't factored in the financial side of the equation to your analysis here... getting rid of Kemba's awful contract was Boston's main and overriding goal... and whoever the trading partner ended up being, they were gonna need to be compensated for taking on that bad contract.
First of all, you've twice used the word "all-star" to describe Kemba Walker. No offense, but those days are over for Kemba... even if he's reasonably healthy next season, he's no all-star.But is it really a bad contract if Kemba comes back fully healthy next year and does his usual 20 PPG, All-Star type year? Because to me, I'd rather have a healthy Kemba on my roster over anything. Not to mention, at a GM, I would not be giving up not only an All-Star PG but also a 1st round pick? That's craziness to me. I don't see how the Celtics win this trade unless they are able to sign a huge free agent with the money that they saved by giving up on Kemba after a bad, injury filled year. Now if tests and whatnot done on his left knee showed some serious damage and that's just not being said or publicized, then that's a different story because Kemba then wouldn't be back to his normal healthy productive years. I hope Kemba goes off next year for OKC.
But is it really a bad contract if Kemba comes back fully healthy next year and does his usual 20 PPG, All-Star type year? Because to me, I'd rather have a healthy Kemba on my roster over anything. Not to mention, at a GM, I would not be giving up not only an All-Star PG but also a 1st round pick? That's craziness to me. I don't see how the Celtics win this trade unless they are able to sign a huge free agent with the money that they saved by giving up on Kemba after a bad, injury filled year. Now if tests and whatnot done on his left knee showed some serious damage and that's just not being said or publicized, then that's a different story because Kemba then wouldn't be back to his normal healthy productive years. I hope Kemba goes off next year for OKC.
You must have missed some of his games with OKC before they shut him down.
But is it really a bad contract if Kemba comes back fully healthy next year and does his usual 20 PPG, All-Star type year? Because to me, I'd rather have a healthy Kemba on my roster over anything. Not to mention, at a GM, I would not be giving up not only an All-Star PG but also a 1st round pick? That's craziness to me. I don't see how the Celtics win this trade unless they are able to sign a huge free agent with the money that they saved by giving up on Kemba after a bad, injury filled year. Now if tests and whatnot done on his left knee showed some serious damage and that's just not being said or publicized, then that's a different story because Kemba then wouldn't be back to his normal healthy productive years. I hope Kemba goes off next year for OKC.