sonnyblack65
Well-Known Member
I concurNot even close. Defender has every right to go for the ball which he did. Diggs should've had an INT.
I concurNot even close. Defender has every right to go for the ball which he did. Diggs should've had an INT.
SureSure you're not a closet 12?
you're not a closet fag?Sure you're not a closet 12?
Sure?Entertaining game none the less
But you can't go through a player.
Remember all the whinning with the Butler INT during the SB?
PI all day long. The announcer dont know shit about football. Refs are the Seahawks 12th man
You cant go through the reciever even if you are going for the ball
Many many 12s wanted DPI, many. Probably a bunch of haters as well. Go bump the threads if you need proof.Uh, from who? I said from day 1 it was a clean interception. The problem I had with that whole play was:
1) Everyone saying it was dumb to pass when Lynch was 1 for 4 within 2 yards of the goal line and New England STACKED the box.
2) The pass was fine but why in the FUCK were they throwing it to probably their 4th best WR and not doing a rollout giving Wilson the chance to go to the back corner, run it in, or throw it away...
I don't remember many people saying it was DPI on Butler... I certainly didn't and NEVER said New England should've been called for DPI there. I don't seem to remember many Seattle fans saying that either nor do I remember really ANYONE saying that Seattle got screwed with no DPI call there...
The fuck are you talking about NW?
Many many 12s wanted DPI, many. Probably a bunch of haters as well. Go bump the threads if you need proof.
Yep my bad, Hyde did recover that.
I saw it different. I see Diggs bumping him from behind and coming over his back.He didn't go through him or impede the route, they got there at the same time and Diggs had a far better jump/height and angle at it. Had Diggs not been there Fitz probably would've caught it.
My nose is stuffed af so I can’t breathe to easyOK, Seachicken fans. You can breath now.
Refs took that game from the cards. Blatant PI,. you cant plow through a reciever
I saw it different. I see Diggs bumping him from behind and coming over his back.
Not flagrant but could've been called.
It was closer to OPI than DPI, and it was neither. DB has a right to go up to get the ball in his own space. And Fitz hit him, not the other way around.He didn't go through him or impede the route, they got there at the same time and Diggs had a far better jump/height and angle at it. Had Diggs not been there Fitz probably would've caught it.
Honestly, as much as I can't stand Aikman, he was right all game about not targetting Hopkins enough. I don't get it. DHop was lined up on Tre Flowers most of the night and Flowers is Seattle's weakest link DB.Short week. Arizona didn’t watch their own game tape.....
Just throw it up to Hopkins!!,
Who has the burden of proof? Is this a court of law?Uhh technically, you need to bump the threads to show the proof.
That wasn't PI a defender has as much right to the ball as the receiver. If he was turned around, it would have been PIRefs took that game from the cards. Blatant PI,. you cant plow through a reciever
Refs took that game from the cards. Blatant PI,. you cant plow through a reciever