WhiteMamba
John: 8:36
So then guys who rode the pine for the Celtics in the 50s are better than Jordan.
Bullshit.
would this make Bob Horry >>> Larry Bird?
![Noidea :noidea: :noidea:](/images/smilies2/noidea.gif)
![Laugh :laugh: :laugh:](/images/smilies2/laugh.gif)
So then guys who rode the pine for the Celtics in the 50s are better than Jordan.
Bullshit.
According to Magic, he himself isn't even top 10 of all time and is no better than Steve Kerr or Derek FisherSo then guys who rode the pine for the Celtics in the 50s are better than Jordan.
Bullshit.
According to Earvin "stupid fuck" Johnson, the answer is yes.would this make Bob Horry >>> Larry Bird?
![]()
"Who is the Big O?"- Bill "Russel" experts
The "Big O" was Oscar Robertson.
Magic Johnson is the ONLY Laker who rates comparison with Bill Russell!
The "Big O" was Oscar Robertson.
Magic Johnson is the ONLY Laker who rates comparison with Bill Russell!
Kareem, Wilt, Elgin and The Logo all say Hi!!
They were good, but I'll take Magic over any of them.
Who, to Laker fans, is "The Logo?" Jerry West, maybe?
They were good, but I'll take Magic over any of them.
Who, to Laker fans, is "The Logo?" Jerry West, maybe?
Yes, Jerry West. He is the NBA logo!! To me, Magic is the greatest Laker AND the GOAT. However, Kareem, Wilt and Jerry West belong in ANY conversation about greatest Laker and/or GOAT.
I've watched West in the past, and wished he had been a Celtic, but he is the only Laker other than Magic I would say that about.
Larry Legend #1
then the list can begin.
The "Big O" was Oscar Robertson.
Magic Johnson is the ONLY Laker who rates comparison with Bill Russell!
Jordan
Magic
Bird
They're the three greatest fundamental basketball players that ever lived. Debate everyone else, but those three are in stone.
Wilt Chamberlain ate Russell alive and he even admitted it. ATE. HIM. ALIVE.
And upon what basis can you compare Russell to Kareem and do it with a straight face?
Wilt won more scoring titles, but Russell won more rings.
No coincidence there.
Wilt OVERVALUED offense, Russell knew better.
Which is a nice way of saying Wilt totally dominated Russell.
"Wilt could have been as good as Russell is he didn't 'overvalue offense' so much. I mean 100 points in one game and averaging 50 points for an entire season? Just think how good he could have been if he didn't 'overvalue offense' so much."
This debate is laughable.
Wilt won more scoring titles, but Russell won more rings.
No coincidence there.
Wilt OVERVALUED offense, Russell knew better.
If I remember correctly the Lakers LOST that game. The opposition scored well over 100, that much I'm sure of.