yutch
New Member
I gotta wait until Monday before I see most of that first half, NFL Network was doin' some Total Access incoherent nonsense and didn't start showing the Bears until the final seconds of the first half...
As far as I'm concerned, they can go straight to hell.
Anyhoo, the score would indicate it was a disaster of sorts. I know it's preseason and the Bears are playing a vanilla offense or defense without much of a game plan, but am I to assume that Seattle is doing the same?
I'm not ready to jump off the boat just yet - way too premature - but I'm getting concerned.
I missed the first quarter myself, but from what I've seen, Seattle's been kicking a few more tires than us. Case in point: Pete Carroll just challenged a play up 34-0 late. Sure, he's a dick, and that's a dick move, but it says something about how they're approaching this game. We've been more conservative, just looking for something that works.
The linebackers are a disaster, and while our DTs got upfield a bit, I thought Paea looked awful at NT. Heck, the rookies are the ones I've seen maintain gap responsibility.
Specifically, I'm seeing absolutely nothing of the hybrid defense I thought we'd see. It's so bad that you don't even need to look at the line: the LBs say it all. Remember the deep drops Urlacher used to take? On a shocking number of plays tonight, we had three guys doing the same thing. No one firing up to cover a gap left by some befuddling mix of 1- and 2-gap assignments by our linemen, even on obvious running plays. Everyone left on play after play in the no-man's land that Urlacher used to span when he was a physical freak.
And our secondary follows suit, playing behind guys way too often. Peanut played trail technique on his guy on a short TD pass, which was maddening.
I know that I've given Tucker a lot of rope on the other site, but the scheme and/or Tucker's management of the offseason sucks. Wanny-style.