Explain the 12th ball. Explain the properly-inflated Colts balls.
Oh, don't worry. They will.
Explain the 12th ball. Explain the properly-inflated Colts balls.
Explain the 12th ball. Explain the properly-inflated Colts balls.
I only want to know one thing. Where do I sign up to have this much attention paid to my balls.
I only want to know one thing. Where do I sign up to have this much attention paid to my balls.
They cheated.
Explain the 12th ball. Explain the properly-inflated Colts balls.
Maybe we should wait for all the information to come out. It's been reported that the officials checked the balls and that they passed, but it has not been confirmed if the officials actually used a guage.
Deflate-Gate: An NFL Ball Boy's Perspective on Preparing Footballs - NBC News
Typo on my part, and probably make it a lot, especially when I type fast and don't proof.
It's not deflection, it's simply pointing out there may be more to this story, for example the officials didn't use a gauge pre-game, meaning they never really checked the balls and approved them for use.
If that were to turn out to be true then this is an NFL issue not a Pats issue.
yes with science ... nothing is going to be done to bb or tom terrific (brady).. so they should just drop it ... unless there is a picture of either of them deflating the balls they are in the clear due to lack of proof ... you can assume all you want but it still isnt proof .... i also dont see what the big deal is .. the pats man handled luck and the colts to shear embarrassment it didnt affect the outcome of the game .. time to move on
Right, so you are hanging your hat on the idea the balls presented were all already under inflated and not checked properly by the ref. And that still isn't a Pats issue how? You do realize the team presents the balls for inspection and are in FULL control over the inflation before that inspection right?
There is no chance this is just some idle coincidence. It wasn't some incompetence by the league. Now they might be guilty of not catching something when they should have, but they didn't cause it. Big difference.
They cheated. Cheating isn't any different when you win by a lot. They've been doing this shit consistently for at least a decade and the NFL is scared to do anything about it because Kraft is so powerful.
And this isn't plausible why? A. Rogers admits to doing it all the time, because the refs don't always gauge the balls.
They cheated. Cheating isn't any different when you win by a lot. They've been doing this shit consistently for at least a decade and the NFL is scared to do anything about it because Kraft is so powerful.
Doing what all the time? Link? Are you saying Rodgers admitted to doctoring the balls because they aren't checked? Would like to read that.