He can be really "ignored", now big time, since he got his dumazz banned.I am bewildered! After all that lecturing from miamivice (aka Ramon Santiago) about the total ineptitude of the Cleveland Indian offense....none of it stuck with you Tribe fans? You mean you are not considering Vice's touting of Uribe being as "old as fuck"? And what about Gomes being a total waste and a good bet to be injured? And his chuckling about signing Byrd did not affect you in any way?
As proven by his exact and accurate predictions about the Royals the past two years - Vice has proven himself a baseball expert of the highest level! How can he be ignored?????
Yea, so it could definitely be a lineup where there are no real holes, even if there's a lack of big time hitters...
Looking at the past 3 year numbers for the guys in their lineup:
Gomes - 106 OPS+
Napoli - 116 OPS+
Kipnis - 112 OPS+
Lindor - 122 OPS+
Uribe - 115 OPS+
Byrd - 116 OPS+
Davis - 99 OPS+
Santana - 119 OPS+
Brantley - 128 OPS+
Chisenhall - 96 OPS+
So virtually all of the main position players have been right around or above league average in recent years.
And just another exhibit of how sabemetrics tell a very small, if any story at all
Napoli. Uribe, Davis., Chisenhall, Byrd
These are not very good hitters, most of them once were, but yet sabemetrics say they are
So, the recorded history of how these hitters have performed is less accurate that your personal opinion of them?
And just another exhibit of how sabemetrics tell a very small, if any story at all
Napoli. Uribe, Davis., Chisenhall, Byrd
These are not very good hitters, most of them once were, but yet sabemetrics say they are
Really? Considering a 100 OPS+ is considered average, they're saying Davis (whose OPS+ over that span is 99) is "very good"? Or Chisenhall and his 96 OPS+?
id put more value in the fact that guys like Rajah Davis, Marlon Byrd and Juan Uribe really couldnt find a team all winter, until the late stages, more so than some obscure sabemetric measures
Really? Considering a 100 OPS+ is considered average, they're saying Davis (whose OPS+ over that span is 99) is "very good"? Or Chisenhall and his 96 OPS+?
No one is saying they're "good," let alone "very good."
I don't think I'd call OPS+ "obscure." Certainly OPS is not, and OPS+ is just a small step past that.
From an offensive standpoint, Napoli, Byrd and Uribe have actually been pretty good hitters over the last three years and relatively durable considering their ages over the last three years. Since you're not into OPS+, here's their games played/per season and slash lines over the last three.
MN - 130 GP - .245/.352/.440/.792
MB - 145 GP - .269/.313/.469/.782
JU - 118 GP - .281/.329/.432/.761
To put those slash lines into perspective, he're the MLB averages last year:
.254/.317/.405/.721
Oh I didnt even know that, I dont pay attention to that stuff, but I thought he was making the point they were good, so i countered
Stan's point was that their are no massive black holes in the lineup.
That said, I fully agree with you that the Indians' lineup leaves quite a bit to be desired - particularly given the pitching staff they seem to have.
We will re-visit this discussion at a later date
Lets just say I think Colin Cowghill, Rajah Davis, Marlon Byrd and Juan Uribe are pretty close to being black holes
Fair enough, and you could very well be right. With guys like Castro, Gregorius and Hicks on the team you follow, you would certainly know a black hole when you see one.
id put more value in the fact that guys like Rajah Davis, Marlon Byrd and Juan Uribe really couldnt find a team all winter, until the late stages, more so than some obscure sabemetric measures
Each one of the guys mentioned is a nice complimentary player on any team (See Juan Uribe Mets 2015)....My issue would be if 4 or 5 of those guys are making up most of my everyday lineup
Or because all of them are all age 35+ and teams didn't want to commit to the number of years/dollars the players wanted?
And if you want to completely discredit Sabermetrics, what traditional stats say those 3 are 'bad' hitters compared to their position?
K ROD sucks.
Colin Cowghill batting .188 in 2015?
Mike Napoli, now batting cleanup, batting .224 with 18 HR and 50 RBI in 2015?