2022 Bears Offseason

[BearsWillWin]

Chiefs have more picks than anyone in the draft with 12.

They must have tanked to get all those picks. Bastards.

 

[BsGenius]

Chiefs have more picks than anyone in the draft with 12.

They must have tanked to get all those picks. Bastards.

Wise words from a phys ed major.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Wise words from a phys ed major.

New York Giants
New York Jets
Jacksonville Jaguars
Detroit Lions

Four teams with a .333 or worse record over the last 5 years. Many, many high draft picks.

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

New York Giants
New York Jets
Jacksonville Jaguars
Detroit Lions

Four teams with a .333 or worse record over the last 5 years. Many, many high draft picks.

Explain.

Bad records = high draft picks.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Bad records = high draft picks.

Ok, good start, at least you grabbed the most basic, 5th grade level concept. Now let's go a little deeper. 4 teams with high draft picks for at least 5 years, and in reality more. Yet they remain really bad teams.

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

Ok, good start, at least you grabbed the most basic, 5th grade level concept. Now let's go a little deeper. 4 teams with high draft picks for at least 5 years, and in reality more. Yet they remain really bad teams.

Explain.

Because high draft picks alone doesn't determine success...? There are probably hundreds of things an organization must get right to have a winning team.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Because high draft picks alone doesn't determine success...? There are probably hundreds of things an organization must get right to have a winning team.

Ding ding ding ding!!! Give this man a cigar!!! See? We're getting somewhere, Corky. Let's move on. Now, since you just admitted that high picks alone don't determine success, why then do 90+% of your posts circle around us needing to tank to get those picks?

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

Ding ding ding ding!!! Give this man a cigar!!! See? We're getting somewhere, Corky. Let's move on. Now, since you just admitted that high picks alone don't determine success, why then do 90+% of your posts circle around us needing to tank to get those picks?

Explain.

Because higher picks are better than lower picks?????? Doorknobs everywhere.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Because higher picks are better than lower picks?????? Doorknobs everywhere.

But you just got thru saying that HUNDREDS of things determine the success or an organization. Yet you devote 90+% of your posts to the idiocy of tanking for better draft picks. It makes no sense, which of course in a way makes sense since it's you posting this crap.

I think I have yet another nickname for you: Rain Man. Just like in the movie, you keep repeating lines over and over and over.
Must tank to get higher draft picks.
Higher draft picks good idiots.
Must tank to get higher draft picks.
Higher draft picks good idiots.
Must tank to get higher draft picks.
Higher draft picks good idiots.
Must tank to get higher draft picks.
Higher draft picks good idiots.

But don't worry, Corky remains my favorite for you. That and this:

 

[BsGenius]

But you just got thru saying that HUNDREDS of things determine the success or an organization. Yet you devote 90+% of your posts to the idiocy of tanking for better draft picks. It makes no sense, which of course in a way makes sense since it's you posting this crap.

lol

What i choose to focus on and the frequency at which i talk about it is irrelevant. So because there are hundreds of things needed to succeed, i should post about tanking 1/100th of the time. That is your point? lol okay dummy. I'll choose to talk about whatever i want, when i want and how much i want.

You can post pictures and distract as much as you want to try to save face but it won't work. Tanking was the right move. And it's evident based on where this organization is now.

But keep up with the straw man, it's working out well for you. You just look like an idiot who's running from the conversation, AGAIN.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

lol

What i choose to focus on and the frequency at which i talk about it is irrelevant. So because there are hundreds of things needed to succeed, i should post about tanking 1/100th of the time. That is your point? lol okay dummy. I'll choose to talk about whatever i want, when i want and how much i want.

You can post pictures and distract as much as you want to try to save face but it won't work. Tanking was the right move. And it's evident based on where this organization is now.

But keep up with the straw man, it's working out well for you. You just look like an idiot who's running from the conversation, AGAIN.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

lol

What i choose to focus on and the frequency at which i talk about it is irrelevant. So because there are hundreds of things needed to succeed, i should post about tanking 1/100th of the time. That is your point? lol okay dummy. I'll choose to talk about whatever i want, when i want and how much i want.

You can post pictures and distract as much as you want to try to save face but it won't work. Tanking was the right move. And it's evident based on where this organization is now.

But keep up with the straw man, it's working out well for you. You just look like an idiot who's running from the conversation, AGAIN.

 

[BsGenius]

View attachment 292506

i’d bet you are wildly unsuccessful in life. Just a gut feeling. Lol

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

i’d bet you are wildly unsuccessful in life. Just a gut feeling. Lol

You could be right about my lack of success. But here's what I noticed in your previous and quite desperate response. You go on and on, which alone tells me how pissed you are, being you're otherwise famous for just one or two line "opinions" (always to be taken in jest mind you). But in essence, here is what you said in defense of your idiotic stance.

Tanking was the right move. And it's evident based on where this organization is now.

So had it not been for one season of failing to tank, we'd be much stronger now, is that a fair statement? Or are you going to hinge on this and say there are HUNDREDS of other reasons, but instead to act like Rain Man and just repeat your tired, worn out line over and over and over again?

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

You go on and on, which alone tells me how pissed you are

Repetition does not equal anger. You don't read much do you?

So had it not been for one season of failing to tank, we'd be much stronger now, is that a fair statement? Or are you going to hinge on this and say there are HUNDREDS of other reasons, but instead to act like Rain Man and just repeat your tired, worn out line over and over and over again?

Had we of tanked we would be better off now. I can't be any clearer.

Was it a mistake for Indy to "suck for Luck"?

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Repetition does not equal anger. You don't read much do you?



Had we of tanked we would be better off now. I can't be any clearer.

Was it a mistake for Indy to "suck for Luck"?

Prove that Indy purposely tanked to draft Luck. If it was so obvious then there are must be tons of articles confirming this. About 4 or 5 links will do.

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

Prove that Indy purposely tanked to draft Luck. If it was so obvious then there are must be tons of articles confirming this. About 4 or 5 links will do.

Explain.

Stop being a coward. Answer the question. Indy sucking whether intentional or not (for the sake argument) landed Luck, was this a bad move? Did indy sucking help or hurt them?

Case closed.

 

[Lake Shore Drive]

Stop being a coward. Answer the question. Indy sucking whether intentional or not (for the sake argument) landed Luck, was this a bad move? Did indy sucking help or hurt them?

Case closed.

Prove it. Not asking for much. You claimed Indy openly threw their season in order to draft Luck. All I ask is for proof. Should be easy.

Explain.

 

[BsGenius]

Prove it. Not asking for much. You claimed Indy openly threw their season in order to draft Luck. All I ask is for proof. Should be easy.

Explain.

Prove that you're not stupid. Exactly.
Thanks for playing dummy.

 

[nebearsfan70]

Bills matched Bates offer.