Heatles84
Well-Known Member
A. use your brain. In 1992 when Shaq left Orlando, Orlando could not even afford to pay Shaq the contract he got. Now that is not even an issue. The CBA, salary cap, national TV, has totally transformed the league (not surprised this is over your head).
Orlando low-balled him, they could've offered him whatever they wanted given that they had his Bird Rights. That's why they lost him.
The inside story: How the Magic let the Lakers steal Shaquille O'Neal
B. The Lakers and Knicks sucked balls and have not won anything for years. The two biggest markets in the league, 2 of its "marquis" franchises, have done nothing. The Lakers- like plenty of other franchises, bottomed out for years and are now rising again. This is opposed to the rest of their history.
Yet the Lakers share odds-on favorites to win the title this year and have two top 7 players. They're not even in the same boat as the Knicks. The only thing they share in common with the Knicks is a large market. Lakers front office is inexperienced and not that good. NY is every sort of bad.
C. The ownership/management thing is absolutely true. The Buss children, like many products of nepotism, really have shown that they are clueless thus far.
And yet they have two top 7 players.
D. I mean was your brain deprived of oxygen as a child for a long period of time? At one point if you lived in Dallas, you likely wouldnt even see ONE Pistons game on national TV the entire year. Now you can see every single game of every single team. the Cavs had the most national tv games for a while. That NEVER EVER would have happened in the early history of the NBA.
*Wiggy ignores that good teams are on ESPN/TNT a lot more*
How many games were the Wizards, Knicks, Cavs and Kings on in prime time?
E. Marketing speaks for itself obviously. When Cleveland and Orlando- two of the smaller markets in the NBA have the 2 biggest marketers in the game, it is not your father's NBA anymore. You can be in ANY city and be huge now- when that simply was not the case years ago.
Huh?
F. Revenue sharing. Bird Rights. Designated player extensions that can only be given to players you draft. Hard cap for sign and trades. Draft pick trade restrictions. All of these things, in tandem have altered the competitive balance from being more of a free market- to more restrictive.
G. The NBA used to be a business where families owned most of the teams- and those families businesses were the teams. Whether that was the Miller's in Utah or the Pollin's in Washington or Buss' in Los Angeles. The wealth of the owners was in the team that they owned. Now teams are owned by guys that were super-successful in other businesses and buy their team is an expensive toy/plaything- like a Ballmer or Arison or DeVos or Allen or Gilbert or Gore or Lacob, etc.. These guys own BILLION dollar franchises--- and that billion dollar franchise does not even represent 20% of their net worth. Basketball expenditures are no longer limited by a team's revenues. They are limited to how competitive an owner wants to be (with some common sense restrictions of course).
Yet.....the Golden State Warriors ownership has a combined net worth of roughly $1.5 billion, maybe less, and they just finished off a dynasty run.
all of that adds up to how the Lakers and Knicks can suck for years on end, and the league still thrives. The advantages those teams once enjoyed have been thoroughly mitigated.
Yet, AD went to the Lakers because he forced a trade there. Kawhi and PG wanted to go back to LA (Clippers), because of the market.